Reconquista the Sequel, the de-islamification of Europe - Page 67 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Political issues and parties in Europe's nation states, the E.U. & Russia.

Moderator: PoFo Europe Mods

Forum rules: No one line posts please. This is an international political discussion forum, so please post in English only.
#14895404
He is a far right hate preacher (as well as a convicted football hooligan). He belongs in the same prison cell with the jihadist Imans and other similar trash. He is just your average criminal, having a camera in his hand does not make him anything more (he was also convicted after he entered the US illegally once under a false passport, making him an illegal immigrant :lol: ).
#14895407
He is not working class. He is lumpen scum from the criminal underclass. Working class people don't spend most of their time in prison cells. Also Luton is not part of London (it is in Bedfordshire), it wouldn't be "another" Londoner as Robson is not a Londoner himself. Maybe you should talk about something that you understand instead of pontificating about a nation you are totally ignorant of?
#14895572
Since most of the prisoners in the detention centers are Muslims and blacks, the authoritarian tactic is to frighten those who will dare to speak against "multicultrism" (euphemism to Islamization), an EU state policy since 1973 oil embargo, and give them a taste they will not forget. The simple border patrol were sympathetic and said to them, "they are suffering in silence". TR, mentions how the authorities allow in ISIS sympathizers who later commited terrorists attacks against British citizens.

Full interview after release



Of course, this story (the greatest of our time) is censored in BBC, they prefer to go along with Arab lobby's talking points.
#14895594
I have been doing news searches to see the reaction in the media. Seems fairly low key in the UK but in Central Europe reports are spreading. Even Norway is watching. This is bad press for the UK’s reputation as a liberal democracy.

The UK government probably thinks they were being smart but all they succeeded in doing is handing Martin and friends political legitimacy. Talk about an ‘own goal’.

But it not surprising. The politically correct progressives have consistently failed to understand their opposition. They can’t really. To do so means understanding the motivations for opposition to PC doctrine which would force them to look in the mirror. Maybe they are worried they won’t like what they will see? Better, in the mind of the establishment, to shut down dangerous ideas. Yet to do so is to resist change. That makes the establishment brittle.

Now, it isn’t inciting hatred that is the real danger. It is exposing the nature of the beliefs the establishment uses to maintain control that is the danger. They have got away with dominating the broader community for decades but now that they control is being challenged, they are demonstrating to the world they basic authoritarian tendencies.

Martin describes a link between multiculturalism and totalitarianism. He seems to be suggesting the former leads to the latter. I suggest it is the other way around. Multiculturalism, at least in the West, is an instrument used to marginalise a majority.

Now, multiculturalism in and of itself is not necessarily a bad thing. It is neutral. What matters is how an establishment deploys multiculturalism. In the West, only immigrants are multicultural and the native majority are not. Furthermore the immigrants are given preferential political status while the natives are surveyed for any sign of resistance. The effect is to deprive the native majority of political influence, concentrating said influence in the hands of an elite group. The immigrants might be violent radicals, this is of small concern to the establishment since minorities lack the power to mount a serious change to the establishment’s control. The latter is primarily concerned with keeping the majority under the thumb.
#14895597
Another case today. Lauren Southern is accused on "racism" by authoritarian British authority. The Islamic lobby assimilated criticism of Islam to "racism". They are now using human rights laws against those who defend the British people.



Lauren Southern is the alternative media repoter that expose the white farmers plight under the racist ANC rule in South Africa

viewtopic.php?f=33&t=172731

She's detened in Calais.



You may ask who is responsible for this madness if the gov is Tory. They are Islamists "human rights" lawyers and their many allies in the British left. They don"t care about world opinion.
#14895604
noir wrote:Another case today. Lauren Southern is accused on "racism" by authoritarian British authority. The Islamic lobby assimilated criticism of Islam to "racism". They are now using human rights laws against those who defend the British people.



Lauren Southern is the alternative media repoter that expose the white farmers plight under the racist ANC rule in South Africa

viewtopic.php?f=33&t=172731

She's detened in Calais.



You may ask who is responsible for this madness if the gov is Tory. They are Islamists "human rights" lawyers and their many allies in the British left. They don"t care about world opinion.



Yes, I noticed the news regarding Lauren Southern.


There certainly are some dubious characters masquerading as human rights lawyers. In fact the whole field of human Rights is highly politicised and biased. Political correctness protects them from public criticism. The thing is though that the establishment then has ownership of the slant they put on human rights and thus must ultimately be accounted for it. The leftie allies are Chardonnay socialists. Well to do, educated people who value status above all else. That is what drives PC, the desire to be above ordinary people and the need to legitimate the resulting hierarchy.


So they reorganise society with themselves on top. The ones who define the norms, generally justifying the social engineering on grounds of past or present wrongs being corrected. But ultimately benefiting those who get the choice in deciding what to change. Unsurprisingly those norms target the native majority, since monopolising power requires their marginalisation. Muslim HR lawyers, radicals, Antifa, and so on are all useful in reaching this goal. It is all about power.


However, the PC white people are very arrogant. They misunderstand and underestimate their opponents. But they also misunderstand and underestimate their allies, such as a Muslim radicals and activities. The Western establishment slowly gives in to those values and beliefs.

(They do the same with China also, slowly abandoning human rights under sustained pressure. Notice how that stablishment started to become subservient to China at Davos 2017 when they domestic power base was challenged by Trump. As their power is challenged in Europe, will they become subservient to their Islamic allies?)


The substance of human rights begins to disappear. The same can be said for liberal values in general. The concept is appropriated but the substance is abandoned. The reverse discrimination characteristic of PC is a good example of taking liberal values, using them to justify actions but then arbitrarily choosing who has them and who doesn’t. In effect they are taking the power to decide who has rights and who doesn’t.


This episode of detention is a good example of pretending to up hold noble values while using that moral authority to justify sacrificing the principle of freedom of conscience. World opinion does matter. The dubious HR lawyers are going to look pretty silly when the establishment that protects them loses the credibility to continue doing so.


We are watching the 68ers regime falling from grace. It is actually historically significant.
#14895607
It's obious that her main crime is exposing the racist nature of ANC. The Islamists turned themself as patronage of the black cause, you can witness it also in America with Black Lives Matter

Image

The Islamists depend on the elevation of their cause to level of apartheid cause. You can see it also in PoFo by Islamists propagandists.
#14895613
@foxdemon
So they reorganise society with themselves on top. The ones who define the norms, generally justifying the social engineering on grounds of past or present wrongs being corrected. But ultimately benefiting those who get the choice in deciding what to change. Unsurprisingly those norms target the native majority, since monopolising power requires their marginalisation. Muslim HR lawyers, radicals, Antifa, and so on are all useful in reaching this goal. It is all about power.


We will see how the Islamists will treat their "gender fluidity" BS, when they will grab more power
  • 1
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
Russia-Ukraine War 2022

@Tainari88 I think it is you who fails to unders[…]

The young need to be scared into some kind of mor[…]

It's the Elite of the USA that is "jealous[…]

Anomie: in societies or individuals, a conditi[…]