- 06 Apr 2022 11:19
#15221298
I don't know, what is your problem?
Nobody cares about imaginary interpretations. The accord was a pathetic document that acted as a pretext for NATO's bombardment.
Between you 2, you are a far worse propagandist that has difficulty accepting the hubris of the accords let alone claimed numbers, impossible to verify. But as I already said I do not care to convince you about these numbers, you are definitely not going to convince me and certainly not with this attitude.
It has already been established that western media did not even care being filmed by Serbian crews while editing propaganda images because they "rightly" believed western media would drown out Serbian media especially back in the 90's when social media had not happened yet and all information was dominated by the major news channels, it has also been established by UN officials(with sources posted by myself in this thread) that the west exaggerated the casualties by a factor of 4(this happens both ways, exagerating the casualties on the other side and reducing the casualties on its side). So this needs to be accounted for when talking about "media coverage" of the Yugoslav war when the US had declared the "end of history" and itself as the sole hegemon.
Rugoz wrote:So what's the problem.
I don't know, what is your problem?
- It says nothing about "costs to be paid by Yugoslavia", only about being free of taxation of fees.
In the end, on 18 March 1999, the Albanian, American and British delegation signed what became known as the 'Rambouillet Accords'[5] while the Serbian and Russian delegations refused. The accords called for NATO administration of Kosovo as an autonomous province within Yugoslavia; a force of 30,000 NATO troops to maintain order in Kosovo; an unhindered right of passage for NATO troops on Yugoslav territory, including Kosovo; and immunity for NATO and its agents to Yugoslav law. In addition, NATO forces would have the right to use local roads, ports, railways, and airports without payment of duties, dues, tolls or charges, as well as the right to use the electromagnetic spectrum without payment. NATO would also have the right to requisition public facilities for its use free of cost. NATO forces would have the right to hire local personnel who upon employment with NATO would be exempt from local laws in respect to acts performed in their official capacity, national service obligations, local labor laws, and taxes on their salaries. Local infrastructure would be subjected to improvements or modifications to by NATO forces when deemed necessary to facilitate the mission.[1]
It's explained re-interpreted here
Nobody cares about imaginary interpretations. The accord was a pathetic document that acted as a pretext for NATO's bombardment.
In 1999, it was estimated that 488–527 Yugoslav civilians died as a result of NATO bombing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_ ... h_analysis
Not 2,500 or that half of those were Kosovo Albanians (which makes no bloody sense in the first place). Your source is a Serbian/Russian propagana rag.
Between you 2, you are a far worse propagandist that has difficulty accepting the hubris of the accords let alone claimed numbers, impossible to verify. But as I already said I do not care to convince you about these numbers, you are definitely not going to convince me and certainly not with this attitude.
It has already been established that western media did not even care being filmed by Serbian crews while editing propaganda images because they "rightly" believed western media would drown out Serbian media especially back in the 90's when social media had not happened yet and all information was dominated by the major news channels, it has also been established by UN officials(with sources posted by myself in this thread) that the west exaggerated the casualties by a factor of 4(this happens both ways, exagerating the casualties on the other side and reducing the casualties on its side). So this needs to be accounted for when talking about "media coverage" of the Yugoslav war when the US had declared the "end of history" and itself as the sole hegemon.
EN EL ED EM ON
...take your common sense with you, and leave your prejudices behind...
...take your common sense with you, and leave your prejudices behind...
- By ingliz
- By KurtFF8
- By Doug64