- 06 Jun 2011 18:53
#13726854
Boeing has plans to manufacture 787 Dreamliner planes.
Boeing is looking to establish manufacturing assembly plants in South Carolina.
Obama is not happy with Boeing's decision. Obama's administration has therefore filled a complaint against Boeing to block production of the planes.
Why would Obama attack a company that is trying to create jobs, considering a 9% unemployment rate in America currently?
Obama is going after Boeing, because South Carolina is a "right to work" state, and has a law against forced Union membership.
Is this action by Obama dictatorship? It sure looks like it.
Never in American history, has the government told a private company where it can and cannot establish its business within the US.
Liberals love regulation of the private sector. This is the kind of regulation you get. Regulations that make it very difficult for businesses to thrive. Regulations that make startup businesses think twice about starting a new business. No new businesses, invariably means high unemployment. No wonder unemployment rate is so high in America? 3+ years into Obama's administration, things are only getting worse.
Obama being totally beholden to AFL-CIO Unions, is actually cracking down on a private business - Boeing. Obama wants Boeing to pay workers at Union rates, rather than regular market rates.
So, here's a high tech company, trying to alleviate Obama's abysmal economy, by trying to create employment for people without jobs. What is Obama's reaction? His reaction is to attack Boeing.
If this stalemate is not resolved, or resolved in favor of Obama, one of three things is going to happen...
1. Boeing would quite its plans, until Obama's socialist authoritarian administration is out of the way.
2. Obama would force Boeing to establish its plants in Washington state (a forced Union state).
3. Boeing could take its business overseas.
I believe the last option is more likely.
Is Obama interested in fixing the American economy? Or is he just interested in socializing the country?
So, on the one hand we demonize American businesses for operating overseas. But on the other hand, we refuse them the freedom to save money in America where possible. by regulating them to death. Where is the sense in that? Even US government contractors operate abroad to save money. An example is The Government Printing Office for US Passports setup in Thailand. The decision was made, because Obama's administration forces union membership on workers, and therefore too expensive operate in America.
The interesting thing here is, that a company like Boeing needs massive sums of money to run its business. Obama and Liberals hate companies making profits. So, if Obama had his way, there would be no Boeing in America, since the company would never make profits enough to justify being in business in America.
Boeing is looking to establish manufacturing assembly plants in South Carolina.
Obama is not happy with Boeing's decision. Obama's administration has therefore filled a complaint against Boeing to block production of the planes.
Why would Obama attack a company that is trying to create jobs, considering a 9% unemployment rate in America currently?
Obama is going after Boeing, because South Carolina is a "right to work" state, and has a law against forced Union membership.
Is this action by Obama dictatorship? It sure looks like it.
Never in American history, has the government told a private company where it can and cannot establish its business within the US.
Liberals love regulation of the private sector. This is the kind of regulation you get. Regulations that make it very difficult for businesses to thrive. Regulations that make startup businesses think twice about starting a new business. No new businesses, invariably means high unemployment. No wonder unemployment rate is so high in America? 3+ years into Obama's administration, things are only getting worse.
Obama being totally beholden to AFL-CIO Unions, is actually cracking down on a private business - Boeing. Obama wants Boeing to pay workers at Union rates, rather than regular market rates.
So, here's a high tech company, trying to alleviate Obama's abysmal economy, by trying to create employment for people without jobs. What is Obama's reaction? His reaction is to attack Boeing.
If this stalemate is not resolved, or resolved in favor of Obama, one of three things is going to happen...
1. Boeing would quite its plans, until Obama's socialist authoritarian administration is out of the way.
2. Obama would force Boeing to establish its plants in Washington state (a forced Union state).
3. Boeing could take its business overseas.
I believe the last option is more likely.
Is Obama interested in fixing the American economy? Or is he just interested in socializing the country?
So, on the one hand we demonize American businesses for operating overseas. But on the other hand, we refuse them the freedom to save money in America where possible. by regulating them to death. Where is the sense in that? Even US government contractors operate abroad to save money. An example is The Government Printing Office for US Passports setup in Thailand. The decision was made, because Obama's administration forces union membership on workers, and therefore too expensive operate in America.
The interesting thing here is, that a company like Boeing needs massive sums of money to run its business. Obama and Liberals hate companies making profits. So, if Obama had his way, there would be no Boeing in America, since the company would never make profits enough to justify being in business in America.
A liberal is someone who feels a great debt to his fellow man, a debt he proposes to pay off with your money.
A corporation’s primary goal is to make money. Government’s primary role is to take a big chunk of that money and give it to others.
A corporation’s primary goal is to make money. Government’s primary role is to take a big chunk of that money and give it to others.