wat0n wrote:I guess that's why the war is still ongoing, because "practically every family has someone conscripted" even in areas outside the control of the Syrian Government
Not sure what you're talking about here, my point is the Syrian government imposed conscription during the war and therefore it would make no sense that Syrians would prioritise attacking their own while fighting against mercenaries a) at all and b) with chemical weapons.
Unless of course Alawites are the only Syrians who matter to you. Because, yes, they have brunt the bulk of the burden.
I'm not sectarian, the jihadi groups like Al-Nusra that you're shilling for, are. And the Syrian government and army includes people from practically every sect in Syria. They were fighting sectarianism from the jihadis who put Alawites in cages and displayed them around town as if they were animals worthy of shaming and killing.
And no, they're not the sect that's had the bulk of burden, that would be Sunnis.
Again, you are still somehow pretending planes and helicopters are incapable of delivering chemical attacks
As I said, it's easy to believe anything you like. Presenting facts is what proves whatever it is you're claiming, but you have none.
No, with chemical weapons they claim not to have. And the threats? Obama didn't follow up with those.
You'd have to prove the Syrians had chemical weapons and they used them. So far that hasn't happened. You didn't with JohnRawls or me or anyone else who would ask, because facts are not on your side.
As for Obama not going further with his intervention and disgusting war on Syria, I'm sure that upset you. Too bad.
Logic is far from being your strong suit here, snowflake
And then the name-calling begins.
You might want to reduce those when honing your skills of arguing, since ad-homs aren't an argument and make you look silly.