"Jews are smartest race in the world and superior humans", Israeli Lawmaker claims - Page 16 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Political issues and parties in the nations of the Middle East.

Moderator: PoFo Middle-East Mods

Forum rules: No one line posts please. This is an international political discussion forum moderated in English, so please post in English only. Thank you.
#14993547
annatar1914 wrote:All of which is to say that you ignored the fact that Joseph's seizing of all the private property and goods.... Saved Egypt and Joseph's people from destruction.

Since this is a pattern that does not appear to be remediable I won't continue these sorts of discussions with you.

No, I did not ignore what Joseph did to save Egypt from the famine. I just did not see any need to bring it up since it seemed self-explanatory to me. But you are wrong about Joseph seizing private property. He actually sold food to the people in exchange for the property. Then he gave them seed to plant the land and required them to give a fifth of the harvest to Pharaoh and allowed them to keep the remaining harvest for themselves. Joseph gained control over all the property and became wealthy through economic supply and demand capitalism.
HalleluYah
#14993556
Hindsite wrote:No, I did not ignore what Joseph did to save Egypt from the famine. I just did not see any need to bring it up since it seemed self-explanatory to me. But you are wrong about Joseph seizing private property. He actually sold food to the people in exchange for the property. Then he gave them seed to plant the land and required them to give a fifth of the harvest to Pharaoh and allowed them to keep the remaining harvest for themselves. Joseph gained control over all the property and became wealthy through economic supply and demand capitalism.
HalleluYah


There are none so blind as those who refuse to see. Saint Joseph the Patriarch saved civilization during the seven year famine by instituting Socialism upon the Egyptians during the crisis. There was not talk of him ''gaining control of the property'', but as basically the Pharaoh's prime minister, the wealth was turned over to the government. There was no talk of any kind of ''supply and demand Capitalism'' in the scripture verses I quoted :eh: :excited: , so let's look at it again :eh: ;


13 There was no food, however, in the whole region because the famine was severe; both Egypt and Canaan wasted away because of the famine. 14 Joseph collected all the money that was to be found in Egypt and Canaan in payment for the grain they were buying, and he brought it to Pharaoh’s palace. 15 When the money of the people of Egypt and Canaan was gone, all Egypt came to Joseph and said, “Give us food. Why should we die before your eyes? Our money is all gone.”

16 “Then bring your livestock,” said Joseph. “I will sell you food in exchange for your livestock, since your money is gone.” 17 So they brought their livestock to Joseph, and he gave them food in exchange for their horses, their sheep and goats, their cattle and donkeys. And he brought them through that year with food in exchange for all their livestock.

18 When that year was over, they came to him the following year and said, “We cannot hide from our lord the fact that since our money is gone and our livestock belongs to you, there is nothing left for our lord except our bodies and our land. 19 Why should we perish before your eyes—we and our land as well? Buy us and our land in exchange for food, and we with our land will be in bondage to Pharaoh. Give us seed so that we may live and not die, and that the land may not become desolate.”

20 So Joseph bought all the land in Egypt for Pharaoh. The Egyptians, one and all, sold their fields, because the famine was too severe for them. The land became Pharaoh’s, 21 and Joseph reduced the people to servitude,[c] from one end of Egypt to the other. 22 However, he did not buy the land of the priests, because they received a regular allotment from Pharaoh and had food enough from the allotment Pharaoh gave them. That is why they did not sell their land.

23 Joseph said to the people, “Now that I have bought you and your land today for Pharaoh, here is seed for you so you can plant the ground. 24 But when the crop comes in, give a fifth of it to Pharaoh. The other four-fifths you may keep as seed for the fields and as food for yourselves and your households and your children.”

25 “You have saved our lives,” they said. “May we find favor in the eyes of our lord; we will be in bondage to Pharaoh.”

26 So Joseph established it as a law concerning land in Egypt—still in force today—that a fifth of the produce belongs to Pharaoh. It was only the land of the priests that did not become Pharaoh’s.


Emphasis in Bold.

Here's some common sense for you to think about. If there is an economic crisis under Capitalism, a emergency in which the collapse of civilization is imminent because of potential mass starvation. A man comes and takes first all of everyone's money and withdraws it from circulation and gives it to the government, in return for distributing some of the food grains stored during the seven years of plenty. Then people ask for more, and he takes all their livestock for the government in return for more grain. They get through that next year alright, but then they run out of foodstuffs and give all their land and themselves to give to the government. If this were the case, everyone would say that the politician who did this had the government buy up private property and place it into their stewardship, from Capitalism into Socialism.

But for you, who worships wealth and rich people and capitalism, this presents a problem, because all of this is in the Holy Bible. If this man (who saved ancient civilization in my opinion) had been anyone else than the man of God, Joseph, mentioned in Scripture, you'd be defaming his memory and sending him to hell in a New York minute. So you go blind, you claim the clear meanings of these Scriptures mean something else.

This is the real reason that the Israelites and those who follow the God of Israel today bother the world so much, that these type of versus in Scripture are revolutionary dynamite that would change the world order if carried out in society.

But you are invested emotionally in what you have said to people here, and there is probably a zero chance of you saying anything different, of changing your mind. I'm not saying these things for you, but for others who don't worship your Golden Calf nor follow the sick end-times theology that has ruined and ended millions of lives already.

I'm done.
#14993569
I agree with you. But I'm not sure it's socialism to me.

It's more along the lines of a "buy-back scheme" that he invented. Joseph it seems to me invented the buy-back scheme. He took voluntary acquisition of the land and it became under today's standards Publicly Owned. He didn't seem to force them(compulsory acquisition). He let them make the decision themselves.

Yes it's a tenant of Socialism, but it's not the entire idea of Socialism. As Socialism is known to also use Compulsory acquisition as well.
#14993570
colliric wrote:I agree with you. But I'm not sure it's socialism to me.

It's more along the lines of a "buy-back scheme" that he invented. Joseph it seems to me invented the buy-back scheme. He took voluntary acquisition of the land and it became under today's standards Publicly Owned. He didn't seem to force them(compulsory acquisition). He let them make the decision themselves.

Yes it's a tenant of Socialism, but it's not the entire idea of Socialism. As Socialism is known to also use Compulsory acquisition as well.


Well, i'd agree somewhat with this, after all the Egyptian farmers obviously still were on the land, and somebody still had to tend to the livestock, but this is the same in Socialism too as in any other type of economic system. And note that they continued in servitude to the Kings of Egypt ever after...What happened is what usually happens; people are pushed to a crisis point before they will try to do the right thing. Also, none of this would have happened, the survival of civilization, of Egypt and the Israelites during this famine, had there not been a man in charge who was prepared and had the foresight from God to do this. And definitely not under some kind of free market system, wouldn't you agree? Seems to me that certain people confuse Adam Smith's ''Invisible Hand'', with the Hand of God., I don't think that you're one of them, by the way ;) :)
#14993576
annatar1914 wrote:There are none so blind as those who refuse to see. Saint Joseph the Patriarch saved civilization during the seven year famine by instituting Socialism upon the Egyptians during the crisis.

I think you are missing the moral of the story. Economies go up and they go down and we should rely on the wisdom of God to get through the down times. We should all have saving plans for times of plenty, as Joseph did, so that we can draw on those savings during the bad times.

The Pharoah's government under the direction of Joseph stored away 20% of the grain produced during the 7 years of plenty, so they would have it to sell during the seven years of famine. By using the economic principle of supply and demand capitalism, Joseph increased the wealth for the government by selling the stored grain when the demand increased during the years of famine.

This was not socialism, because Joseph did not confiscate the means of production, but simply stored 20% of the excess so that it covered the expected downturn in the economy. Then when the famine occurred, people in Egypt and from other parts of the world came with money to buy the grain they needed. Those that ran out of money during those 7 years of famine were allowed to trade their livestock to buy the grain they needed. This greatly increased the wealth of Egypt until Joseph was able to also acquire land, in exchange for grain, from many of the people that had run out of money to buy grain.

At the end, it appears to resemble socialism because the people had to give up their property just to stay alive. So it is clear to me that socialism is not good for the freedom and liberty of the people, because they gave up their freedom and became slaves working land that used to be their own. I suppose you can say it is better than starving to death, but I would rather be Joseph the capitalist.

annatar1914 wrote:But for you, who worships wealth and rich people and capitalism, this presents a problem, because all of this is in the Holy Bible.

I don't worship wealth, rich people, and capitalism. I just respect them. I would rather be rich in capitalism than poor in socialism.

annatar1914 wrote:I'm done.

I hope so.
HalleluYah
#14993643
Hindsite wrote:I think you are missing the moral of the story. Economies go up and they go down and we should rely on the wisdom of God to get through the down times. We should all have saving plans for times of plenty, as Joseph did, so that we can draw on those savings during the bad times.

The Pharoah's government under the direction of Joseph stored away 20% of the grain produced during the 7 years of plenty, so they would have it to sell during the seven years of famine. By using the economic principle of supply and demand capitalism, Joseph increased the wealth for the government by selling the stored grain when the demand increased during the years of famine.

This was not socialism, because Joseph did not confiscate the means of production, but simply stored 20% of the excess so that it covered the expected downturn in the economy. Then when the famine occurred, people in Egypt and from other parts of the world came with money to buy the grain they needed. Those that ran out of money during those 7 years of famine were allowed to trade their livestock to buy the grain they needed. This greatly increased the wealth of Egypt until Joseph was able to also acquire land, in exchange for grain, from many of the people that had run out of money to buy grain.

At the end, it appears to resemble socialism because the people had to give up their property just to stay alive. So it is clear to me that socialism is not good for the freedom and liberty of the people, because they gave up their freedom and became slaves working land that used to be their own. I suppose you can say it is better than starving to death, but I would rather be Joseph the capitalist.


I don't worship wealth, rich people, and capitalism. I just respect them. I would rather be rich in capitalism than poor in socialism.


I hope so.
HalleluYah


Nothing in the story I have quoted about three or four times happened as you have presented it, based on the text and common sense alone, so I am to believe that I'm correct in finding you incapable of having a serious discussion on anything of significance. With you, I think it comes down to the money, well good luck on that.
#14993738
annatar1914 wrote:Nothing in the story I have quoted about three or four times happened as you have presented it, based on the text and common sense alone, so I am to believe that I'm correct in finding you incapable of having a serious discussion on anything of significance. With you, I think it comes down to the money, well good luck on that.

I thought you said you were done. Anyway, you quoted a small section that was not in full context and you also misrepresented what was taking place. I just explained it in the context of capitalism that you deliberately and dishonestly left out. Socialism is not a long term solution for poverty and as the children of Israel eventual determined in the Book of Exodus, slavery under the socialism in Egypt was a miserable life that they needed to escape from.
Last edited by Hindsite on 14 Mar 2019 02:41, edited 1 time in total.
#14993739
Hindsite wrote:I thought you said you were done. Anyway, you quoted a small section that was not in full context and you also misrepresented what was taking place. I just explained it in the context of capitalism that you deliberately and dishonestly left out.


That's a complete untruth, so I think it best if we refrain from communicating with each other in the future, I don't see you changing for the better unless a total disaster changes your worldview. I've gone above and beyond on this one.
#14993741
annatar1914 wrote:That's a complete untruth, so I think it best if we refrain from communicating with each other in the future, I don't see you changing for the better unless a total disaster changes your worldview. I've gone above and beyond on this one.

I disagree with your assessment, so it seems that we will have to agree to disagree and move on.
Praise the Lord.
#14993752
colliric wrote:Hindsite, if you mind, may I ask which Church and/or Denomination you are?

I presume Evangelical Pentacostalism?

Well, I was baptized at a very young age (12 years I believe) in a Southern Baptist Church in Texas. But after entering the military, I never returned back to my home town to live and have never bothered to transfer my membership to any of the other Churches that I have attended over the years. When I married my wife, it was in her families small local non-denominational Protestant church. Today my wife is a member of a local United Methodist Church here in August, GA. But due to her age and because of her handicapped condition, we very seldom attend Church now.

In the past, I have attended a variety of groups, but no Pentacostals, even though when I attend some Messianic groups, some pretended to speak in tongues. I have even attended services with the Mormons and the JWs. Today, I just consider myself an Evangelical Protestant Christian.
#14993763
colliric wrote:Technically I am a Catholic Charismatic Renewal Roman Catholic.

I have been involved with the CCR in the past. Now just a normal average Catholic.

As you know, there are many things we Protestants differ with Roman Catholics. One of the simple things is this idea about Holy Communion or the Lord's Supper. I believe the bread and wine are symbolic of the new covenant and do not magically become the real body and blood of Christ.
#14993765
colliric wrote:Technically I am a Catholic Charismatic Renewal Roman Catholic.

I have been involved with the CCR in the past. Now just a normal average Catholic.


Since we're being open about our affiliations, and in the interests of better understanding, I come from a family who were Roman Catholic on my mother's side and Protestant on my father's. For years I myself was a traditional Roman Catholic, until my conversion to Orthodox Christianity-which was years before my marriage to an Orthodox Christian. However, due to personal and familial considerations initially, I developed a strong sympathy for the ''Old Believer'' Orthodox Christians and their faith, and their views are best represented here in my opinion;

en.rpsc.ru

And here's a video of a Easter worship service procession;



It is estimated that some 15 million Old Believers perished during the years of Romanov persecution-beginning in 1654 AD but more fiercely after 1666 AD. And for over 300 years, prior to the savage persecutions of the early Bolshevik period, all for holding to the Christian faith of their fathers, undiluted and unchanged.

@Hindsite ,

You can't help but be offensive;

One of the simple things is this idea about Holy Communion or the Lord's Supper. I believe the bread and wine are symbolic of the new covenant and do not magically become the real body and blood of Christ.


It's not ''magically'', Hindsite, it's ''miraculous''. It's based on Scripture, Christ's ''Bread of Life'' discourse in the Gospel of St. John, and numerous other places. Orthodox Christians believe in this too, along with Roman Catholics, and it was believed from the beginning, always and everywhere by all Christians until about 500 years ago. All.
#14993775
annatar1914 wrote:@Hindsite ,

You can't help but be offensive;

It's not ''magically'', Hindsite, it's ''miraculous''. It's based on Scripture, Christ's ''Bread of Life'' discourse in the Gospel of St. John, and numerous other places. Orthodox Christians believe in this too, along with Roman Catholics, and it was believed from the beginning, always and everywhere by all Christians until about 500 years ago. All.

Well, I never seen it happen ''miraculous'' either. So I still think Jesus only meant the bread and wine to be symbols of His body and blood that he gave up for us at the crucifixion in cutting the new covenant.

And he took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to them, saying, "This is my body given for you; do this in remembrance of me." In the same way, after the supper he took the cup, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you."
(Luke 22:19-20 NIV)

Notice Jesus states His blood is poured out for us.
Praise the Lord.
#14993776
Hindsite wrote:Well, I never seen it happen ''miraculous'' either. So I still think Jesus only meant the bread and wine to be symbols of His body and blood that he gave up for us at is crucifixion in cutting the new covenant.

And he took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to them, saying, "This is my body given for you; do this in remembrance of me." In the same way, after the supper he took the cup, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you."
(Luke 22:19-20 NIV)


That's not what the quote originally is. It says; ''of my blood'', not ''in''. And what part of literal Scripture do you not understand? ''For My flesh is real food, and My Blood is real drink...'' But you have to have real faith to believe in the Miracle, because you can't see or sense it, you just have to have faith. St. Paul speaks about people eating and drinking unworthily and dying because of doing so, so it's not mere food and drink anymore...

Anyway, I'm really tired, there's only so much one man can do unless God helps supply my weakness and mediocrity.
#14993779
annatar1914 wrote:That's not what the quote originally is. It says; ''of my blood'', not ''in''. And what part of literal Scripture do you not understand? ''For My flesh is real food, and My Blood is real drink...'' But you have to have real faith to believe in the Miracle, because you can't see or sense it, you just have to have faith. St. Paul speaks about people eating and drinking unworthily and dying because of doing so, so it's not mere food and drink anymore...

Anyway, I'm really tired, there's only so much one man can do unless God helps supply my weakness and mediocrity.

Okay, whatever you want to believe. It doesn't really make any difference to me what you wish to believe because I believe in what makes sense to me.
HalleluYah
#14993783
Hindsite wrote:Okay, whatever you want to believe. It doesn't really make any difference to me what you wish to believe because I believe in what makes sense to me.
HalleluYah


So Miracles, a specific miracle mentioned in Scripture as something that would happen within the worship of the Christian Church, doesn't ''make sense'' to you and so you reject it?

Guess what? Miracles often defy our personal reason, but God performs them anyway. You reject everything that was taught for over 20 centuries, in favor of historically ignorant modern era strip mall American Protestantism, heavy on the feel good stuff and light on the traditions which God commanded us Christians to observe... No reason, no faith, no tradition, no scripture (really) and no salvation...

But you do what you can by the light God may give you, I won't speak anymore of these matters to you in the future, except to correct blatantly offensive remarks which I pray you won't make. Oh well, you don't give a shit about Christians who disagree with you, even if they are most Christians alive or who have ever lived.
#14993786
Hindsite your translation of the holy bible is one of the worst Protestant Translations. Just bland in every way.

Have you ever tried reading another Translation?

The KJV is beautifully authored in inspired Shakespearean English and is a masterpiece. I had the full 1611 edition(OT+NT+Deuterocanon/Apocrapha) at one stage and in fact it's where I first discovered how inspiring the Maccabees books are too.

The (+New) Revised Standard Version is highly accurate and very modern. And my favourite Protestant version is the Today's English Version(Also known as the Good News Version), I read it as a kid and still love it.

I mean seriously Hindsite I really dislike how bad the NIV is.
#14993789
annatar1914 wrote:So Miracles, a specific miracle mentioned in Scripture as something that would happen within the worship of the Christian Church, doesn't ''make sense'' to you and so you reject it?

Guess what? Miracles often defy our personal reason, but God performs them anyway. You reject everything that was taught for over 20 centuries, in favor of historically ignorant modern era strip mall American Protestantism, heavy on the feel good stuff and light on the traditions which God commanded us Christians to observe... No reason, no faith, no tradition, no scripture (really) and no salvation...

Oh well, you don't give a shit about Christians who disagree with you, even if they are most Christians alive or who have ever lived.

I believe that miracles happen once in awhile, but every time the communion service is given is a bit much to swallow, especially when there is a more reasonable explanation for what Jesus meant. Do you actually get the taste of blood in your mouth when you take communion? I care about all Christians, but I just hate Christians to become delusional and believe in crazy stuff that is not necessary for salvation.

colliric wrote:I mean seriously Hindsite I really dislike how bad the NIV is.

I don't use the NIV that much either, but it was good enough for my point. Today, I most often use the NASB, but I sometimes check a variety of translation when I have some doubt and have the time.
HalleluYah
  • 1
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18

Malthus This is not the ideal place to put […]

Who sells the most arms in the world? The Unite[…]

Indeed, historically conspiracy theories of Jew[…]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

Whats up with this strange idea that ukrainians ar[…]