Far-Right Sage, although I most strongly disagree with your opinions, most of the time I can understand where you're coming from. But this time.. I mean for God's sake, the man singlehandedly screwed an entire country. Between 1974 and 1980 two cargo planes, two fighter jets and six helicopters of the Zairian Army fell out of the sky. None of them were in battle. Than what were the reasons for such unlucky coincedences? It was because Mobutu paid his military so poorly they started to sell spare parts of their planes. Does Authenticité compensate for that? Does Authenticité compensate for an inflation of 9769 % (in 1994). Or does Authenticité somehow justify the 5 Billion US dollars Mobutu stole from his own, poverty stricken people?
Mobutu was a narcistic dictator who not only lead his country to economic disaster, but took thousands of Congolese lives in the progress. And as far as Autheniticité concerns, that was just a pathetic attempt to cover up for his failing policies.
I think Zaire/the Democratic Republic of the Congo/the Republic of the Congo (why don't the latter two just merge?) is one of the poorest and least productive nations on Earth and that likely won't change in a thousand years. Corruption on a massive scale essentially exists in every African nation, even in North Africa and in Mandela's supposed paradise of the new South Africa, it is of course present.
I do reject thie notion, however, that any world leader can never be discussed on the merits of their ideology and programs, but simply whether or not they had a few diamond-crusted palaces. Every head of state steals and has since the dawn of time. It's human nature. Your argument is akin to the U.S. lambasting Saddam because of his Baghdad palaces, meanwhile, golf expeditions, and luxury travel to Spain and European resorts are put on the American dime. I start my analysis from the position that every leader steals and then evaluate their aims, beliefs, and policies.
He also rehabilitated Patrice Lumumba in the last few years of his rule, and even created something of a personality cult around him. Lumumba was a man whom Mobutu himself had been instrumental in murdering. It's as though Stalin had held rallies honouring Leon Trotsky in the late 1940s. This is, in my view, an indication of how politically desperate Mubutu was becoming towards the end.
When Stalin died in 1953 he had built the Soviet system to its most secure position and had nothing to fear of a revolution or destabilization, whether from disaffected Trotskyites or the West. The rehabilitation of Lumumba in Zaire that you're referring to occured at a time in which the Cold War backdrop fizzled out and many regimes around the world which had been placed in rival geopolitical camps now feared that they would be abandoned by their backers or set upon by their enemies in which case their superpower backer would no longer protect them. This was true in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, a non-aligned nation which was useful to the U.S. but had its aid slowed to a trickle and was essentially cutoff, which was a prelude to what was to come with the violent explosion of ethnic tensions in an increasingly failed state.
My point is that I won't crucify Mobutu for this. Under his rule, Zaire, along with South Africa and Rhodesia, helped form an anti-Communist bulwark in Sub-Saharan Africa and Zaire went to great lengths to fight Marxism in many regional conflicts, including the backing of the most honorable UNITA and its interference in the Angolan Civil War. Authenticité was very similar to many nationalist, anti-colonial, and revolutionary conservative ideologies elsewhere which would have fared better in states that were stronger, less divided, and more cohesive, but it wasn't to be in the cards.
"I am never guided by a possible assessment of my work" - President Vladimir Putin
"Nations whose nationalism is destroyed are subject to ruin." - Muammar Qaddafi