noir wrote:Some people are very stubborn. The Whites are finished there. It's time to move on. Europe will reach to the same situation too, you can't sustain a nation without a unifying story.
Heisenberg wrote:Lauren Southern, pioneer of investigative journalism, has just learned that South Africa is dangerous. When's the deadline for Pulitzer Prize nominations?
What to you may seem obvious ignores the phenomenon that the mainstream media is resource rich, but buries a great deal of interesting stories. They are trying to advance a political narrative and they are failing in the internet era.
To really understand that in a larger and, to some degree, a recent historical context, you have to understand that some of our most popular social media was funded in part by In-Q-Tel; that is, the CIA. Their efforts with 6-degrees-of-separation has some very obvious drawbacks. I think the establishment's view was that they would be able to push democratic social narratives all around the world. However, alternative narratives have also arisen, and that puts the establishment narrative in juxtaposition to grass roots narratives.
What it shows is that the modern banking cartels pushing for a global government have made a political decision to denigrate white people, because they are a minority in the world's population. At the same time, they are hiding the fact that racially diverse societies don't work well.
Heisenberg wrote:In all seriousness, I wouldn't be surprised if South Africa went the way of Zimbabwe in the next 20 years.
I wouldn't be surprised either. I imagine a lot of white South Africans will end up in the United States at some point, as probably most other countries wont want them.
Libertarian353 wrote:Lauren Southern burn the coal.
That's unlikely, as Lauren Southern was raised with pretty traditional Christian morality. Why is that a fantasy for you?
Libertarian353 wrote:Whites are less likely to be killed by Blacks compare to other Blacks.
If anybody else makes that point, you accuse them of racism. Why is that?
noir wrote:Black Apartheid.
Again, putting this into a global context, the sort of pollyanna post-WWII efforts at racial integration are failing world wide. Different groups prefer to maintain their distinct cultural, ethnic and racial identities. The liberal narrative started with this painfully naive vision:
Yet it has evolved more like this:
Get to about 1:50 in the above video and MinnieJean Brown picks up on it right away. Yet, it is not state-imposed. It is not culturally imposed. In fact, it is generally discouraged. Yet, that's how people behave naturally without any prompting from anyone, and with intense propaganda to behave in a completely different manner.
noir wrote:Even those who was born after the end of the Apartheid are full of hate, probably the grievance victimhood indoctrination is still going on there
Well, much like the natives in North America, it was a confrontation between a post-feudal proto-capitalist society and hunter-gatherer civilizations. Obviously the hunter gatherers lost. This is also true in Britain where Roman classical civilization clashed with Celtic Iron Age civilization, which lost to the Romans and later the Anglo-Saxons and Normans. Much of what was the British Empire evolved from proto-capitalist to industrial mass production capitalist societies. Even Israel is a good template for clash of civilizations.
The irony is that redistributing the land doesn't work either. Zimbabwe did that and went from a net agricultural exporter to food shortages in short order.
Multi-cultural egalitarianism is a chimera that is blowing up in our faces.