Question about Biology/Sex/Ejaculation - Page 2 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Provision of the two UN HDI indicators other than GNP.
Forum rules: No one line posts please.
#15312920
late wrote:I don't know. It is remarkably easy to damage the brain. So it's not just choking, head butting the ball in soccer, and everything in football needs to stop. Boxing should be banned outright.


People can be strange and barbaric. Sports in general can be rough and dangerous, but humans get a thrill out of violent sports. Is it because our ancestors were violent because they needed to be able to kill animals to eat and survive in the wild and in the jungle?

Civilization and education has made us realize that such things are unnecessary, harmful and awful. But the untamed, uneducated mind just loves blood and violence.

However, in history, we see that the rulers who were educated, encouraged violent sports like gladiator games or bullfighting.
#15313141
Unthinking Majority wrote:I think natural selection explains why women don't usually like to have a man orgasm all over her face. Women who prefer the man to ejaculate inside her instead of all over her are more likely to get pregnant.

So all the women who like it on their face or breasts weren't getting pregnant as much, and therefore not passing on their genes as much, leading to fewer women of this type.


You know, evolution is a very well supported scientific theory, but I have to express skepticism about this particular point.

I have noticed that people often speculate how natural selection can explain all kinds of different things - this would be an example of you making an unfounded guess by appealing to the broad principle of natural selection.

Do you have a more detailed illustration of how this evolutionary idea actually would work?
#15329754
late wrote:
Let's set the philosophical questions to the side.

When humans were smaller, the distance was smaller from the opening of the vagina to where most of the nerves are. That means for most women, regular sex does not adequately stimulate the woman to orgasm. When we get better control of genetics, I expect that will get fixed.

Anyway... our culture is built around delayed gratification. At least, it used to be. That can create a level of excitement that leads to premature ejaculation. I suspect that having regular sex, with the same person, would reduce the level of excitement, and might well cure the problem.

One thing I used to do was to have a woman be in orgasm the first time I entered her. So even if the event was brief, she wouldn't mind much. A gentle tongue speaks many languages..


2 things:

First, isn't the longer average climax time for women related to something else here? From what I've heard it has more to do with women needing some extra time to develop an emotional bond for the person, and this can't happen too fast. Men however, are able to become very aroused very quickly, wholly apart from any sort of romantic feelings for the person. It's a very primitive, neanderthal sort of reaction, that women don't really experience.

Second, isn't it also true that the female orgasm lasts longer? Like it takes longer to build up, and it's not as intense, but when done properly it can actually be better than a male's?
#15330726
Rancid wrote:
I agree on the attire thing. Leaving things to the imagination is not a bad thing.


It's not really about leaving things to the imagination. I actually have a fetish for the material itself, and the way it makes her body look and feel when she wears it.
#15330738
@Rancid

Engaging with @Agent Steel on the topic of sexual fetishes is probably not the best idea in the world…. :)
#15330962
Agent Steel wrote:
It's not really about leaving things to the imagination. I actually have a fetish for the material itself, and the way it makes her body look and feel when she wears it.


oh... ok.

Potemkin wrote:@Rancid

Engaging with @Agent Steel on the topic of sexual fetishes is probably not the best idea in the world…. :)



This reminds me of those signs at the state and national parks I camp at that read "Don't feed the animals." :lol:
#15330997
@Rancid But anyway yeah, back to the question at hand.

I think you agree with me that we could make the argument that the male so called "premature" ejaculation is not in fact premature at all, but it is really the way males are supposed to function. Sure that's too bad for the females, but just as well as the males could be told to "slow down", we could also just tell the females to speed it up. I ain't slowing down. If I cum all over her face and she's not ready for it then she needs to see a doctor and ask him to give her drugs so that she can enjoy it more.
#15331093
Agent Steel wrote:@Rancid But anyway yeah, back to the question at hand.

I think you agree with me that we could make the argument that the male so called "premature" ejaculation is not in fact premature at all, but it is really the way males are supposed to function. Sure that's too bad for the females, but just as well as the males could be told to "slow down", we could also just tell the females to speed it up. I ain't slowing down. If I cum all over her face and she's not ready for it then she needs to see a doctor and ask him to give her drugs so that she can enjoy it more.


Yes, I think we can agree. At the same time, you can also take steps to slow it down. To enjoy the journey.

Women can be made to finish quickly as well. If the goal is to ramrod the sex towards completion. Women will have "that thing" that brings them to climax much much much faster. You just have to find it, or they have to tell you what it is. The gentle tongue as someone noted previously, is one of those common areas.
#15331102
In Marilyn Manson's biography he says the first time he had sex he ejaculated upon insertion, didn't even get one pump in. I can't speak on behalf of anyone else but I would be very dissatisfied if I finished that quickly.

You could eat the same dish for every meal that satisfied your nutritional needs perfectly but it wouldn't satisfy your pallet or your stomach. The journey is just as important as the destination.
#15331106
@Agent Steel

I don't know why you are making such a meal of sex. As the song says, 'Birds do it, bees do it. Even educated fleas do it.'

Why can't you?


:lol:
#15331163
Agent Steel wrote:If I cum all over her face and she's not ready for it then she needs to see a doctor and ask him to give her drugs so that she can enjoy it more.


BTW, they probably won't want to bother to have sex again if this is how you are going to approach it.
National debt…

So what is your answer, @QatzelOk ? Just to give[…]

@Potemkin , @Verv , and others: Tomorrow (no[…]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

So what was Russia's net advance in November? The […]

Russia actually had applied to join NATO , even b[…]