- 29 Mar 2020 22:14
#15079758
you should have quit like 10 goes back, but I'm happy that you didn't have the sense to.
What's your point? That's just the methodology, how does that save your dunning kruger blunder? I think it only serves to illustrate your incompetence, you didn't even know that was at question and you were making total death projections.
Well if it's kids with no symptoms then your Imperial model is garbage. You don't even understand the basic implications of your bullshit, you're just hoping most people are too stupid to notice the glaring inconsistencies and contradictions.
I haven't ignored anything, post it and I'll comment.
BeesKnee5 wrote:One last go and then I quit.
you should have quit like 10 goes back, but I'm happy that you didn't have the sense to.
'We formally test these hypotheses by fitting an age-structured mathematical model to epidemic data from six countries,'
What's your point? That's just the methodology, how does that save your dunning kruger blunder? I think it only serves to illustrate your incompetence, you didn't even know that was at question and you were making total death projections.
The epidemic data is tests from these countries. Who do you think is being tested most?
Sick people or kids with no symptoms?
Well if it's kids with no symptoms then your Imperial model is garbage. You don't even understand the basic implications of your bullshit, you're just hoping most people are too stupid to notice the glaring inconsistencies and contradictions.
Strange you are choosing to ignore the research I shared.
I haven't ignored anything, post it and I'll comment.
Socialism without freedom is fascism.