[colliric]

Newsflash: Banks are corrupt.

https://www.news.com.au/finance/busines ... f99566bbec

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/the-banking ... appens-now

.... Further proof that Jesus was right smashing the Money Changers tables to bits and whipping them.

[Godstud]

I don't think you'll find any arguments...

On a related note: It's funny because it's true.

[QatzelOk]

Newsflash: Banks are corrupt.

https://www.news.com.au/finance/busines ... f99566bbec

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/the-banking ... appens-now

.... Further proof that Jesus was right smashing the Money Changers tables to bits and whipping them.

Yes, and banks are still in charge.

Rather than arrest and prosecute corrupt banksters in 2008, the "first black president" gave a years' worth of taxes to them so they could continue to dominate our society after going bankrupt due to their own corrupt practices. And leaders all over the world were forced to follow and then cut social programs for workers.

This was a "everyone else loses" moment that our commercial media totally missed. I guess they were busy writing stories about WMDs and 911 at the time.

Has Australia suffered any terror attacks recently that could block coverage of its corrupt bankster class?

[Beren]

.... Further proof that Jesus was right smashing the Money Changers tables to bits and whipping them.

But it wasn't the real Jesus real Christians believe in.

[ckaihatsu]

People generally prefer the six-pack-abs Jesus.


= D

[SSDR]

@ckaihatsu, What does this have to do with Australia's banking corruption?

You can't even stick to the subject lmfaooo.

Virgin.

[ckaihatsu]

@ckaihatsu, What does this have to do with Australia's banking corruption?

You can't even stick to the subject lmfaooo.

Virgin.

Making shit up again, as usual. Go play in traffic.

[SSDR]

@ckaihatsu, Ooooooooo, you claimed that I am making "shit" up again? As "usual?" No.

It's usual for you to not stick to a subject.

Go hire someone to fart on your face. You can't even get a woman to do that for you out of her heart, you have to hire someone lmfaooo.

[ckaihatsu]

@ckaihatsu, Ooooooooo, you claimed that I am making "shit" up again? As "usual?" No.

It's usual for you to not stick to a subject.

Go hire someone to fart on your face. You can't even get a woman to do that for you out of her heart, you have to hire someone lmfaooo.

Um, no.

I, for one -- unlike yourself -- do not have sexual fantasies involving rape and face-farting.

Maybe stop avoiding politics on a political discussion board. Try *that* out for a change -- !

[SSDR]

@ckaihatsu, I am not avoiding politics. You're once again twisting words by saying.

You keep twisting words you fucking retard.

[ckaihatsu]

@ckaihatsu, I am not avoiding politics. You're once again twisting words by saying.

You keep twisting words you fucking retard.

Hmmmm, no.

You keep falsely accusing me of this-or-that, which just sounds *defensive* on your part.

[SSDR]

@ckaihatsu, Hmmmm, yes.

You're the one who keeps falsely accusing me, tryna make yourself look good. And you tryna make yourself look good just makes YOU look defensive.

I am not defending myself. I don't need to defend myself from you because you're not doing anything that makes me need to be "defensive."

[ckaihatsu]

@ckaihatsu, Hmmmm, yes.

You're the one who keeps falsely accusing me, tryna make yourself look good. And you tryna make yourself look good just makes YOU look defensive.

I am not defending myself. I don't need to defend myself from you because you're not doing anything that makes me need to be "defensive."

And yet here we are -- you've been leveling *insults* and false accusations at me that are *unwarranted*.

You're trying to make things *interpersonal* when there's nothing personal here. I don't know you, and I don't care to know you. You don't know me but you're clawing for some kind of contrived relevance by addressing *me* instead of my politics, which is what this board is *supposed* to be for.

[SSDR]

@ckaihatsu, You're the one that is being personal. You're the one who needs to twist others' words, that's a sign of someone being personal. I don't need to know you Chris. And you never state your politics. All you do is copy and paste, even others have said that you never really state your own opinions.

[ckaihatsu]

@ckaihatsu, You're the one that is being personal. You're the one who needs to twist others' words, that's a sign of someone being personal. I don't need to know you Chris. And you never state your politics. All you do is copy and paste, even others have said that you never really state your own opinions.

No, actually I'm not -- I'm responding to your provocations, that's all.

My politics, if you *really* want to read it, is here:


Labor credits Frequently Asked Questions

https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads/20 ... -Questions

[SSDR]

@ckaihatsu, Yeah you sure are responding, by twisting words and pasting useless links

You're a moderator on an anarchist website. And I disagree with your model, it doesn't work.

[ckaihatsu]

@ckaihatsu, Yeah you sure are responding, by twisting words and pasting useless links

You're a moderator on an anarchist website. And I disagree with your model, it doesn't work.

Oh, no, you're saying that someone on the Internet doesn't agree with me -- ? Bummer, braw.

RevLeft is now frozen, so no one's *anything* over there.

You can't say that my model doesn't work, nor can anyone, since it hasn't even been *tried* -- it would require a global proletarian revolution for the right conditions for it to be tried-out.

You're back to being a vacuous *contrarian* again, probably just so you can express your petty antagonisms.

[SSDR]

@ckaihatsu, Yeah someone doesn't agree with you. You acting like me pointing that out being a big deal makes you once again, twisting words.

Your model wouldn't work, it wouldn't be classified as socialist.

You're backing to twisting words ya loser.

[ckaihatsu]

@ckaihatsu, Yeah someone doesn't agree with you. You acting like me pointing that out being a big deal makes you once again, twisting words.

Your model wouldn't work, it wouldn't be classified as socialist.

You're backing to twisting words ya loser.

It's downright *funny* that you're not even *specifying* how I'm allegedly 'twisting words' -- if you were so upset about such 'behavior' from me you could easily *point out* where I'm supposedly doing these things, but instead you'd rather make flippant accusations without providing any evidence.

In other words, you're *wrong* and hypersensitive -- you'd rather devolve the discussion to some petty interpersonal drama than deal with the actual substance of the politics.

You *still* haven't shown any understanding of how my 'labor credits' model works, so you're *far* from competence there on any *judging* of its merits.

[SSDR]

@ckaihatsu, If it's funny to you then why do you sound upset? Your useless words don't have any meanings. I have pointed out to you multiple times on how you keep twisting words. Are you seriously retarded? I have fucking told you many times and have given you examples on how you keep twisting words.

I am not hypersensitive. What does that have to do with politics. You are retarded as fuck. I had political discussions with you, and I kept telling you that you keep twisting words and that I have given you many examples through out time. You're trying to make me look bad so you can look good.

I can judge your "labour credits" model without explaining because all you're going to do is twist my words if I do explain. And you're going to lie and say that you won't. And you lie and you twist words because your model doesn't make any sense, so you have to do that in order to cover up your fucking flaws.