- 07 Mar 2020 16:34
#15073285
@noemon
No it hasn't. The main fighting force is the clerics and their militias, and they're the main creator of refugees.
I have provided evidence for it, and you have not only not refuted it but haven't provided a single point to disprove it.
Well, if the EU is a major trading partner and investor in Iran, and all the US sanctions targetting individuals and companies funding militias like Hezbollah are somehow done through Europe, then the funding must be coming from Brazil or south Africa. Right?
Paint it? Banking is the main industry in the UAE after oil.
And the UAE along with all other gulf states have blocked any activety relating to the Quds forces for years now.
The only source of income remaining for the Quds forces which is essentially the IRGC and its militias is through companies and business men doing business in and with Europe, which the US is targetting with sanctions now.
How exactly are you not able to understand this?
So, you either haven't read it at all or trying to strawman it. good to know.
The Period in question is from 2015 till present, and the size of the total investment is over 10 billion with Germany and Spain putting 7 billion of them alone.
Turkey along with 20 other European countries put the remaining 3 billion.
Europe is a trading partner with Iran, while Turkey is atleast a rival.
And Iran uses Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon to bypass the sanctions, not Turkey.
Dude, the whole fucking refugee crisis is because people are fleeing ethnic cleansing and war crimes done by the IRGC and its militias in Syria.
Turkey is a second mover, meaning it's responding to the crisis caused by the Quds forces, not creating it.
Then clearly everyone else in Europe is blind, because the refugee crisis and flow began years before Turkey got involved, and currently it started in Aleppo with ethnic cleansing (The topic that everyone was discussing just a few months ago and the UN was demanding action to stop it) with Turkey interfering to stop it before reaching Idlib.
The current refugee flow began before the Turkish invasion.
Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Yemen, Afghanistan, Russia, etc.
Clearly Turkey is the only foreign force in Syria.
The source of the crisis is the ethnic cleansing done by the regime and it began before Turkish invasion.
Fighting Syrians my ass.
Boy, there more Lebanese and Iraqi fighters fighting Turkey and its Syrian allies than there are Syrians.
No honey, it's more like you have no memory at all of what Syria was before.
Before the war, Syria was a fascist country that was under never-ending military rule with this military routinely committing massacres against any area that dares to oppose it.
And for those "foreign meddlers", you probably should be looking at Iran, Iraqi Hezbollah and Hashd, and Lebanese Hezbollah and their military presence all over Syria more so than that tiny corner with Turkish presence.
ISIS proxy?
Listen, you can keep repeating how Turkey is the source of the problem for ever, it wont change the very simple fact that the crisis began almost a full year before Turkey even went in.
That "nonsense" conflict that has been going on for around 2-3 decades now and is beginning to flare up again?
Also, I really advice looking up why Turkey was invited into NATO.
And I'm guessing France, the UK, and Belgium are not in the EU?
The EU as a whole hosted less than 2 million refugees, less than either Lebanon or Jordan has taken.
And the EU paid 2 billion to Turkey to safe gaurd its borders when it committed to paying 7.
Finally, if the EU isn't responsible, then maybe it should police its members then. When you're in a union, the actions of one will reflect on all.
It wont be fine, nor will it repair and rebuild.
over half the population left and not planning to go back under Baath and IRGC rule.
The ethnic cleansing will continue, but I guess once they're dead, they wont make any noise so that would be fine by outsiders.
And the country is destroyed and under the full control of the IRGC which has an interest in keeping it destroyed.
I said around 7 billion because the amount is 6.7B.
Also, Turkey claims it only received 1.8B, but anyways.
Noting that not only the amount is not enough to do anything, but also is done through 4 years which is why Turkey decided fuck it and took things into its own hands to relocate refugees back into northern Syria.
It's not beggers when each side has to do something for the other. If the EU doesn't stick to its own commitment, then Turkey has no obligation to keep hosting millions of refugees and not simply open the borders.
Sure, and since EU members were involved, then I guess it's the EU's responsibility to tell them to go foot the bill instead of throwing responsibility on the whole union.
Yes, and Greeks aren't the only ones with bad history with the Turks, but it comes at times we should look beyond our own nationalistic tendencies and take things more logically.
If Europeans and Greeks don't trust Turkish forces to establish the safe zone, then back in 2015 when a safe zone was proposed, they should all have voted for the UN forces to establish the zone and safe gaurd it.
It's not "propaganda", when a piece of the army splits off and starts to fight the government, we call that a coup.
More so would be a country that lost half its population, destroyed, and under foreign occupation.
You have a made a wrong argument from pages back in which you stated that: "If Europe does not want immigrants then she should stop funding the clerics in Iran". Your argument has been proven wrong from every single side because:
No it hasn't. The main fighting force is the clerics and their militias, and they're the main creator of refugees.
I have provided evidence for it, and you have not only not refuted it but haven't provided a single point to disprove it.
b) You have not shown any evidence that these militias are being funded by Europe as you claimed to support this tangent you brought forward.
Well, if the EU is a major trading partner and investor in Iran, and all the US sanctions targetting individuals and companies funding militias like Hezbollah are somehow done through Europe, then the funding must be coming from Brazil or south Africa. Right?
EU trade in Iran is less than the trade Iran does with the UAE a country of less than 10mil, which you now paint as the banking hub of the ME when in your previous posts you blamed EU banks for funding Iran
Paint it? Banking is the main industry in the UAE after oil.
And the UAE along with all other gulf states have blocked any activety relating to the Quds forces for years now.
The only source of income remaining for the Quds forces which is essentially the IRGC and its militias is through companies and business men doing business in and with Europe, which the US is targetting with sanctions now.
How exactly are you not able to understand this?
then you also brought forward a sentence that says that Europe(including Turkey) has invested in Iran 10 billion during the period 1992-2008. You should be able to tell yourself why that does not prove your argument right in the slightest(see timeline for example 1992-2008 and the fact that Turkey is included in category of European FDI), I am letting you know that it doesn't prove your argument right, neither the main argument itself nor the tangent that you have gone off.
So, you either haven't read it at all or trying to strawman it. good to know.
The Period in question is from 2015 till present, and the size of the total investment is over 10 billion with Germany and Spain putting 7 billion of them alone.
Turkey along with 20 other European countries put the remaining 3 billion.
c) Europe has sanctions against Iran, while Turkey is the country Iran uses to bypass the sanctions against it.
Europe is a trading partner with Iran, while Turkey is atleast a rival.
And Iran uses Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon to bypass the sanctions, not Turkey.
hy on earth would we blame Iran for the open actions of the Turkish police and government? Are you all there mate?
Dude, the whole fucking refugee crisis is because people are fleeing ethnic cleansing and war crimes done by the IRGC and its militias in Syria.
Turkey is a second mover, meaning it's responding to the crisis caused by the Quds forces, not creating it.
And as far as I and everyone else in Europe views it, currently it is Turkey, Turkish backed militias that are responsible for the crisis in Syria.
Then clearly everyone else in Europe is blind, because the refugee crisis and flow began years before Turkey got involved, and currently it started in Aleppo with ethnic cleansing (The topic that everyone was discussing just a few months ago and the UN was demanding action to stop it) with Turkey interfering to stop it before reaching Idlib.
The current refugee flow began before the Turkish invasion.
Turkey is the last foreign man standing in Syria fighting Syrians and their legitimate government. And clearly not for very long.
Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Yemen, Afghanistan, Russia, etc.
Clearly Turkey is the only foreign force in Syria.
Turkey is at present the source of the crisis in Syria.
The source of the crisis is the ethnic cleansing done by the regime and it began before Turkish invasion.
She is the last foreign man standing in Syria fighting Syrians and their legitimate government.
Fighting Syrians my ass.
Boy, there more Lebanese and Iraqi fighters fighting Turkey and its Syrian allies than there are Syrians.
You seem to have a short memory but Syria was fine before this and she will be fine again when all the foreign meddlers leave and let Syria return to normality.
No honey, it's more like you have no memory at all of what Syria was before.
Before the war, Syria was a fascist country that was under never-ending military rule with this military routinely committing massacres against any area that dares to oppose it.
And for those "foreign meddlers", you probably should be looking at Iran, Iraqi Hezbollah and Hashd, and Lebanese Hezbollah and their military presence all over Syria more so than that tiny corner with Turkish presence.
You are arguing that Europe should help Turkey maintain her losing presence and her ISIS proxy presence in Syria!!! When in fact that is the source of the problem in Syria.
ISIS proxy?
Listen, you can keep repeating how Turkey is the source of the problem for ever, it wont change the very simple fact that the crisis began almost a full year before Turkey even went in.
Turkey has already failed in her war in Syria and has signed a capitulation with Russia, her days in Syria are numbered. None of this exaggerating nonsense will happen but even if it does happen, that is her problem, not ours. Actually most people would welcome a weak Turkey since she is an irredentist and revanchist state with aggressive territorial ambitions against us, Turkey being taught a lesson is most welcome. Europe's problem is only to secure her borders not to rescue Erdogan from humiliation.
That "nonsense" conflict that has been going on for around 2-3 decades now and is beginning to flare up again?
Also, I really advice looking up why Turkey was invited into NATO.
It would be a better conversation if you actually used the proper words to refer to the actors you speak of and you do not conflate actors in a movie. The EU did not participate in Syria, France & the UK did and the EU has already hosted millions of Syrians and has paid billions to Turkey for these refuggees even though the EU itself has done nothing in Syria.
And I'm guessing France, the UK, and Belgium are not in the EU?
The EU as a whole hosted less than 2 million refugees, less than either Lebanon or Jordan has taken.
And the EU paid 2 billion to Turkey to safe gaurd its borders when it committed to paying 7.
Finally, if the EU isn't responsible, then maybe it should police its members then. When you're in a union, the actions of one will reflect on all.
Syria was fine before all this mess started and will be fine again when every foreign meddler leaves the country to heal.
It wont be fine, nor will it repair and rebuild.
over half the population left and not planning to go back under Baath and IRGC rule.
The ethnic cleansing will continue, but I guess once they're dead, they wont make any noise so that would be fine by outsiders.
And the country is destroyed and under the full control of the IRGC which has an interest in keeping it destroyed.
First of all, that is not true and if you want to be taken seriously you ought to provide evidence to support your arguments. The evidence says otherwise. The EU pledged 6 billion not 7 and has released half of that money because she is monitoring where the money is being spent, hence the process has been slow.
I said around 7 billion because the amount is 6.7B.
Also, Turkey claims it only received 1.8B, but anyways.
Noting that not only the amount is not enough to do anything, but also is done through 4 years which is why Turkey decided fuck it and took things into its own hands to relocate refugees back into northern Syria.
As you are aware beggars cannot be choosers.
It's not beggers when each side has to do something for the other. If the EU doesn't stick to its own commitment, then Turkey has no obligation to keep hosting millions of refugees and not simply open the borders.
Second, even if it were true and the EU was being funny with the money, even better. The EU has no obligation to Turkey whatsoever. As I said before the EU did not involve herself in Syria and has no obligation to the mess created. The countries that did, EU or otherwise do have this obligation and after they all remove themselves from Syria they should all sit at a table and figure out who is going to foot the bill for the mess that they created.
Sure, and since EU members were involved, then I guess it's the EU's responsibility to tell them to go foot the bill instead of throwing responsibility on the whole union.
You are telling a Greek to vote that the Turkish army will be protecting people in Syria.
Yes, and Greeks aren't the only ones with bad history with the Turks, but it comes at times we should look beyond our own nationalistic tendencies and take things more logically.
If Europeans and Greeks don't trust Turkish forces to establish the safe zone, then back in 2015 when a safe zone was proposed, they should all have voted for the UN forces to establish the zone and safe gaurd it.
I am not interested into your anti-Assad propaganda, we already have a thread for that and I am warning you now not to turn this thread into that.
It's not "propaganda", when a piece of the army splits off and starts to fight the government, we call that a coup.
Syria would heal and normality would return. Great!
More so would be a country that lost half its population, destroyed, and under foreign occupation.
Vive la révolution