- 04 May 2022 00:53
#15225424
Well, no, you actually did agree to the possibility of being hit because the legal disclaimer is right there on the ticket. No such ticket exists in the case of sex, and if one did, I sure as hell wouldn't be signing it.
If a fetus is a person, then it is within my rights to evict it from my property whenever I feel like. If it refuses to leave, then any violence necessary and sufficient to remove it is justified. But maybe you do not believe in the concept of property.
The child is an unwanted trespasser. It is not murder to defend yourself.
Unthinking Majority wrote:When you go buy a ticket to a baseball game you agree to watch a game, but on the ticket you are given informed consent that a ball may come into the stands and hit you. If you get hit nobody "agrees" to get hit nor does anyone sign a waiver, but they do consent to the risk that it may happen and they can't sue.
Well, no, you actually did agree to the possibility of being hit because the legal disclaimer is right there on the ticket. No such ticket exists in the case of sex, and if one did, I sure as hell wouldn't be signing it.
You are a babyist and do not take fetus rights seriously at all. Or at least this is what your childish insults sound like. Tantrums and ad hominems will not win this argument, and reflect more on you than I.
If a fetus is a person, then it is within my rights to evict it from my property whenever I feel like. If it refuses to leave, then any violence necessary and sufficient to remove it is justified. But maybe you do not believe in the concept of property.
Ok great, make men legally liable for damage. We can also allow men or the DA to sue the mother on behalf of the child when they murder the child. The child didn't even consent to its own creation, and now parents wish to play God again and kill it without its consent. We all know who is really the victim here.
What you don't seem to understand is that there's more than one party involved here, and that they also have rights. All pro-choice people do is talk endlessly about the rights of women. What about the rights of the human life inside her that her (and her beau's) willful actions created ? Conveniently ignored. What's in this for me? ME ME ME ME. I can only assume that if you were a baby inside a womb your opinions about rights would be very different, and so would everybody's. ME ME ME. Unfortunately fetuses don't have anyone to advocate for them as they are voiceless, except for "dumb sexists". Literally the most vulnerable people among the entire population. Fuck them.
Childish insult. Ad hominems. Tantrums will not win this argument.
The child is an unwanted trespasser. It is not murder to defend yourself.