[Drlee]

In the wake of this tragedy, what are Republicans all over the country doing? They are scrambling to undo gun laws. And this in the face of 90% support for gun licensing. Why? Because they are a minority party relying on a coalition of very unintelligent people. These intellectually handicapped people are just fine with the deaths from gun violence as long as they can maintain their sexual attachment to guns. And that is what it is.

I hasten to note for those who believe that legislators in Texas actually believe in carrying guns, that it is a third degree felony to carry a firearm in a government building or a racetrack. It is against the law to carry a gun in an Arizona government building. I wonder why that is? Could it be that the legislators feel unsafe?

[Scamp]

Congress just spent a billion dollars upgrading their own security, because they feared angry citizens protesting democrat voter fraud, but can’t find any money to help secure schools. Banning guns won’t stop crime, murder, etc, but banning guns is not about stopping murder, protecting citizens or their children, it’s about cementing control over citizens, protecting corrupt politicians from citizens and removing citizens ability to resist future unconstitutional government abuses, of which there will be plenty.

[Wulfschilde]

That last paragraph is a non sequitor to what you said before.

You cant just refer to random issues or even only perceived issues of society as a reason for the shooter, when there is no link to these issues in the first place.

You're trying to exploit the event for your own personal political agenda.

Of course there's a link. Only a crazy person goes in and attacks a bunch of preschool kids. Ubiquitous drug use, unlimited porn and constant online bullying makes some people crazy.

The real agenda here is civilian disarmament coming from the people who can afford private security.

[Godstud]

Ubiquitous drug use, unlimited porn and constant online bullying makes some people crazy.

Canada the same problems and yet no mass school shootings. Hmmm... It seems to me that this isn't the problem. Guns are.

The real agenda here is civilian disarmament coming from the people who can afford private security.

The real problem is so many guns and the people who have them. Agenda...

I should have known it would into conspiracy theory territory at some point. Is it the Illuminati this time?

[Drlee]

Congress just spent a billion dollars upgrading their own security, because they feared angry citizens protesting democrat voter fraud, but can’t find any money to help secure schools.

Spoken like a real Faux News Drone. Let's see. Republicans, encouraged by Trump, invaded the Congress carrying weapons and a rope to hang the speaker, and there was no voter fraud. Only every single investigation in every single state or locality, republican or democrat found no fraud.

Banning guns won’t stop crime, murder, etc,

On the contrary. The US in unique in gun deaths. Countries and even localities with appropriate gun laws have fewer deaths.

but banning guns is not about stopping murder, protecting citizens or their children, it’s about cementing control over citizens, protecting corrupt politicians from citizens and removing citizens ability to resist future unconstitutional government abuses, of which there will be plenty.

Bullshit fed to stupid minds. But it is nice to know that you want guns to commit treason. That you want guns so you can kill the soldiers of the United States Military. That you favor private ownership of guns to kill policemen. For that is what you just said you dumb fucking traitor.

[Wulfschilde]

Canada the same problems and yet no mass school shootings. Hmmm... It seems to me that this isn't the problem. Guns are.

The real problem is so many guns and the people who have them. Agenda...

I should have known it would into conspiracy theory territory at some point. Is it the Illuminati this time?

Well, a guy technically doesn't even need a gun to kill a bunch of preschoolers. So this specific incident arguably has nothing to do with guns anyway as he could have done it with a plank of wood etc.

[pugsville]

Well, a guy technically doesn't even need a gun to kill a bunch of preschoolers. So this specific incident arguably has nothing to do with guns anyway as he could have done it with a plank of wood etc.

He does. He simply would have been overpowered by numbers of people.

Having freely available guns means this stuff happened so much easier.

Rights have costs,. You want all Americans having the rights to bear arms regardless of ability to be responsible, this is the direct cost of that right.

[Godstud]

Well, a guy technically doesn't even need a gun to kill a bunch of preschoolers. So this specific incident arguably has nothing to do with guns anyway as he could have done it with a plank of wood etc.

Except that's just a pretend scenario you are making up to downplay the facts about guns. This doesn't happen.

People can RUN from a person with a wooden plank. They can even defend themselves. Your argument is sub-moronic.

[Negotiator]

Of course there's a link. Only a crazy person goes in and attacks a bunch of preschool kids. Ubiquitous drug use, unlimited porn and constant online bullying makes some people crazy.

The real agenda here is civilian disarmament coming from the people who can afford private security.

And did the shooter do drugs, porn, or was he victim of online bullying ?

I dont think anyone would go and kill children unless they are seriously nuts, naturally. Especially at such a still very young age.

The real agenda is that there should be a license required, including background checks, to make it at least much harder for a person like that to get access to weapons. As I understand it, thats already the case in some US states. It should be nationwide.

[ness31]

So Sam Harris owns a gun. Geez, shit must be bad over there

[Wulfschilde]

:eh: Except that's just a pretend scenario you are making up to downplay the facts about guns. This doesn't happen.

People can RUN from a person with a wooden plank. They can even defend themselves. Your argument is sub-moronic.

I think when I was in preschool I had trouble understanding that knives cut things. They would give us little plastic safety scissors that could barely make it through a sheet of paper. No, little kids like that can't run from a grown man. Weak argument.

I think one of the saddest things about this, aside from the event itself, is how blatantly leftists don't expect their rationalizations to connect with their actions these days. It's not gonna end well!

[Scamp]

The real agenda here is civilian disarmament coming from the people who can afford private security.

This^ Absolutely. Our lawmakers have serious firepower protecting them. But they want us to be unarmed subjects, not free citizens.
All these new gun ban attempts the Dems will try say nothing about disarming criminals, just law abiding citizens.

[Pants-of-dog]

@Scamp

You are right.

These schoolchildren should have been armed.

[Scamp]

@Scamp

You are right.

These schoolchildren should have been armed.

Yes I am right.
But your statement about school children is retarded. @Pants-of-dog, Take your meds now.

[Pants-of-dog]

Yes I am right.
But your statement about school children is retarded. @Pants-of-dog, Take your meds now.

Okay!

So your talk about free and law abiding citizens would not help when it comes to school shootings. In fact, you think your idea is “retarded” when it is applied to the problem being discussed.

Yes, I agree that your idea is lacking in intelligence when we apply it to the tragedy in Uvalde.

[Godstud]

No, little kids like that can't run from a grown man. Weak argument.

Your argument is non-existent, as a an adult teacher could defend the students, while they ran from a knife wielding person. Fuck, but you live up to your name, childe!

You fabricate unrealistic scenarios to push a lie, just like the rest of the fuck-in-the-head dipshits who think that ANYTHING is the problem, except guns! That's the lack of argument that you have.

Push fantasy as an argument... sure that works...

[Drlee]

I think @BlutoSays likes to quote Ronald Reagan, a person he presumably admires. Indeed he has a quote from RR in his sig. Let me quote Ronald Reagan in a letter to congress:

, “We are writing to urge your support for a ban on the domestic manufacture of military-style assault weapons. This is a matter of vital importance to the public safety.”

So I am sure Bluto will join his hero in surrendering any assault type weapons.

It is interesting though. As a trained soldier the idea of leading my unit against a bunch of old fuckers with Walmart AR-15's is not frightening. Blow through them long before they even reach out and touch us. My (let us call it an infantry platoon) will have weapons that will destroy them long before they could even use their 'plastic fantastic' short range weapons. I would be far more concerned if they were armed with the odd 30.06 and scope.

Traitors are idiots. They seem to place their confidence in the notion that US soldiers will not obey their orders. That is a fatal error on their part.

[BlutoSays]

[Godstud]

Right, because a cult leader leading people to their deaths with poison, is completely the same as a guy with a gun killing kids in a school. This is a false equivalency.

False equivalency:
False equivalence is a logical fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency. Colloquially, a false equivalence is often called "comparing apples and oranges."

It's true that sick people don't need a gun to kill people, but it makes it a whole lot easier. You wouldn't have school shootings with GUNS if poison was better.

Your memes are getting dumber, BTW.

[Drlee]

@BlutoSays

It would be really sad if you were as stupid as your troll personal pretends to be. Sadly many Trumpists actually are that stupid.

Another Ronald Reagan quote for you:

“If history teaches anything, it teaches that self-delusion in the face of unpleasant facts is folly.”
― Ronald Reagan