- 10 Jun 2023 19:48
#15276469
Indeed, and that's why I don't think we can make many overarching claims about blocking puberty.
But even if it was safe, why don't we allow the opposite? That is, letting teens take hormones to exacerbate puberty and secondary sex characteristics?
Like, for example, letting scrawny, insecure cisgender male teens take steroids to get ripped.
I think this is a valid question that requires a proper, scientifically grounded answer.
late wrote:Kids, we simply don't know enough.
One of my pet peeves is that the safety and efficacy that is usually required of medical treatments, is incomplete.
The Right wing outrage machine has taken advantage of this. But while it's clear we can't speak authoritatively as to the best ways to proceed with sexual issues, what the Right wants to do is basically the opposite of what a decent human being should consider.
I'm prob the only guy here that has been shot full of girl hormones. It was part of my cancer treatment. It was horrible. But I can't extrapolate out from my experience, a person seeking sex change prob has low T.
This leaves me with a lot of questions for which I don't have answers.
Meanwhile, the rage rolls on, be careful.
Indeed, and that's why I don't think we can make many overarching claims about blocking puberty.
But even if it was safe, why don't we allow the opposite? That is, letting teens take hormones to exacerbate puberty and secondary sex characteristics?
Like, for example, letting scrawny, insecure cisgender male teens take steroids to get ripped.
I think this is a valid question that requires a proper, scientifically grounded answer.