BREAKING: SECOND PUTIN´S A-50 aircraft worth $300 million was landed in hell by Ukrainians. ONLY 5 ? - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Talk about what you've seen in the news today.

Moderator: PoFo Today's News Mods

#15305331
According to preliminary information, the A-50 fell near the Trudovaya Armenia farm in the Krasnodar Territory. The nearest point on the front line from this farm is approximately 250 kilometers. The Ukrainian Armed Forces do not use ground-based anti-aircraft weapons capable of attacking aircraft at such a distance from the front line.

Image

The village of Kanevsky District in Krasnodar Krai, Russia, is 200 km away from the front line. This significantly exceeds the nominal range of the Patriot Air Defense System's PAC-2 surface-to-air missile (160 km). If it were a surface-to-air missile, it would be too dangerous to deploy it at the very edge of the front line. It would need to be placed a little further back, and would require a range much longer than 200km.

It cannot be ruled out that the Ukrainians could use the Soviet S-200 anti-aircraft missile system. The range of some missiles of this air defense system reaches 300 kilometers.

Firstly, this is a stationary system, and deploying it near the front line would be dangerous. Secondly, during the current war, the Ukrainians have used the S-200 mainly for shelling ground targets.

Another version is “friendly fire”. As in the first case on January 14, the AWACS aircraft could have been shot down mistakenly by Russian anti-aircraft gunners.

https://www.bbc.com/russian/articles/ckvewy95l2xo
#15305342
ThirdTerm wrote:According to preliminary information, the A-50 fell near the Trudovaya Armenia farm in the Krasnodar Territory. The nearest point on the front line from this farm is approximately 250 kilometers. The Ukrainian Armed Forces do not use ground-based anti-aircraft weapons capable of attacking aircraft at such a distance from the front line.

Image

The village of Kanevsky District in Krasnodar Krai, Russia, is 200 km away from the front line. This significantly exceeds the nominal range of the Patriot Air Defense System's PAC-2 surface-to-air missile (160 km). If it were a surface-to-air missile, it would be too dangerous to deploy it at the very edge of the front line. It would need to be placed a little further back, and would require a range much longer than 200km.

It cannot be ruled out that the Ukrainians could use the Soviet S-200 anti-aircraft missile system. The range of some missiles of this air defense system reaches 300 kilometers.

Firstly, this is a stationary system, and deploying it near the front line would be dangerous. Secondly, during the current war, the Ukrainians have used the S-200 mainly for shelling ground targets.

Another version is “friendly fire”. As in the first case on January 14, the AWACS aircraft could have been shot down mistakenly by Russian anti-aircraft gunners.

https://www.bbc.com/russian/articles/ckvewy95l2xo

MORE GOOD NEWS, LOOKS LIKE 1917 hit MOSCOW empire again ? :lol:

#15305350
ThirdTerm wrote:According to preliminary information, the A-50 fell near the Trudovaya Armenia farm in the Krasnodar Territory. The nearest point on the front line from this farm is approximately 250 kilometers. The Ukrainian Armed Forces do not use ground-based anti-aircraft weapons capable of attacking aircraft at such a distance from the front line.

Image

The village of Kanevsky District in Krasnodar Krai, Russia, is 200 km away from the front line. This significantly exceeds the nominal range of the Patriot Air Defense System's PAC-2 surface-to-air missile (160 km). If it were a surface-to-air missile, it would be too dangerous to deploy it at the very edge of the front line. It would need to be placed a little further back, and would require a range much longer than 200km.

It cannot be ruled out that the Ukrainians could use the Soviet S-200 anti-aircraft missile system. The range of some missiles of this air defense system reaches 300 kilometers.

Firstly, this is a stationary system, and deploying it near the front line would be dangerous. Secondly, during the current war, the Ukrainians have used the S-200 mainly for shelling ground targets.

Another version is “friendly fire”. As in the first case on January 14, the AWACS aircraft could have been shot down mistakenly by Russian anti-aircraft gunners.

https://www.bbc.com/russian/articles/ckvewy95l2xo

#15305353
The Ukrainians get intelligence by the USA, satellite images....

Russia learns 21 century moderne warfare...

The Ukrainians used small drones (first introduced by Hezboollah against ISIS)

The Russian army did not study the war between armenia and Azerbaijan... Cheap turkish drones were the game changer.


Hitler attacked Polland with 1,4 Million men...Putin Ukraine with just 300 000 Putin expected Zelensky to flee which did not happen


The Russians have still the old Soviet commanding style whitch proven inferrior during dessert storm...
#15305356
Skynet wrote:The Ukrainians get intelligence by the USA, satellite images....

Russia learns 21 century moderne warfare...

The Ukrainians used small drones (first introduced by Hezboollah against ISIS)

The Russian army did not study the war between armenia and Azerbaijan... Cheap turkish drones were the game changer.


Hitler attacked Polland with 1,4 Million men...Putin Ukraine with just 300 000 Putin expected Zelensky to flee which did not happen


The Russians have still the old Soviet commanding style whitch proven inferrior during dessert storm...

Cheap turkish drones ARE YOU SURE ?
PS

Stop condoning Islam Stop condoning Orthodox Juda[…]

@ingliz We have different parts of genetics b[…]

Farage, btw, is a Putin puppet. What a laugh. Th[…]

If the Brits ever come to their senses, that will[…]