- 07 Dec 2024 14:56
#15331866
So I'm not sure what the Jews achieved (or perpetrated depending on your perspective) in the 1950s and early 1960s in terms of ethnic cleansing within Israel, but I think generally we can say that post 1949, the Israelis have been pretty poor at ethnic cleansing, let alone genocide. Yes they've been very good at ethnic infiltration, of building Jewish settlements in Arab areas, but they don't seem to have been very good at cleansing any significant size are of Arabs, not even Jerusalem their capital. The right wing Zionists have seemed to lack any credible long term plan to achieve their Eretz Israel.
Is that about to, or in the process of changing? If it is the Israeli government may feel it needs an environment with much higher levels of violence conflict, war, ethnic cleansing and maybe even genocide, in which actions that were previously unacceptable become acceptable. The ethnic cleansing of the Sudetenland was just not possible in the nineteen thirties. But in the chaos of the second world war and its aftermath many things became possible.
Since the fall of the Soviet Union the Assad's have been caught in a catch 22. Their support for Hezbollah makes them an enemy of Israel. Without their support for Hezbollah, Israel would not care what the Assad's got up to in Syria. Being a prime enemy of Israel on Israel's border is a very bad idea. However their alliance with the Iranian Islamic Republic has been vital for their survival. Its because of the Tehran regime that the Assad's haven't gone the way of the Qaddafis. After the 1991 uprising had been put down, the Saddam regime was pretty secure. It was almost certainly going to require an invasion by the US or Iran to remove them. The Syrian regime is much more vulnerable.
Progressives lie scattered on Woke's highway, Diverse ghosts crowd the young child's fragile eggshell mind.