Doug64 wrote:That works fine for Libertarians and Authoritarians, but it's next to useless for (American) Liberals and Conservatives (or vice versa). They'll end up clustered around the middle of the line and agree on almost nothing.
Yes, but the Liberal and Conservative terminology still doesn't take into account the many different Leftist and Rightist ideologies which are classified outside of this dichotomy. This is a pretty sever problem, in my opinion.
Fraqtive42 wrote:Why someone makes the political choices they do doesn't matter to me as much as whether their choices are fairly predictable. If two people are consistent non-interventionists, IMHO they belong at the same point on the scale even if one makes the call because of the expense and the other because he's morally opposed to imposing our will on foreign peoples.
I would have to disagree. Simply looking at policies rather than the philosophical reasons behind them is superficial. For example, Libertarians, who are often very divided with regards to moral philosophy and disagree with each other often, would be placed in nearly the same place. This could generate much confusion.
Fraqtive42 wrote:Not sure I agree with that. It's first rank of Rationalist and second rank of Small Government are probably fairly accurate, but the Syndicalist political personality profile runs up against my belief that we need a strong but limited central government, both at the federal and state levels.
I should have been more specific when I referred to the Political Personality quiz as describing political philosophy more accurately. When I said that, I was referring to the ranks and measurements themselves, and not the categories (which, in my opinion, should either be made much more complex or just gotten rid of entirely).