Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Donna wrote:I think Sanders will steal the nomination. Warren would have been a nice choice in previous cycles, but having Trump run against another woman candidate would feel too much like 2016 again and it would distract the election from kitchen table issues. Sanders is the only candidate capable of exposing Trump's neocon fraud to the working class.
Zionist Nationalist wrote:...also vote for the one you think will win not want to win
ness31 wrote:Is Tulsi Gabbard dem? I’d like her to win thanks.
Zionist Nationalist wrote:I said this to the democrat supporters here
BigSteve wrote:You can't ask someone to pick who they think will get the nomination and who they don't want to get it, but that seems like what you're doing...
Heisenberg wrote:He said vote for the person you think will win the nomination, not who you want to win the nomination. It's pretty straightforward, and involves making one choice. Leave your personal preference out, and pick who you think will win the Democratic nomination.
Here's what he said: "We have 3 main candidates at this point the rest are not relevant. also vote for the one you think will win not want to win"
The word "also" would mean "in addition to" or "additionally". In other words, it's asking you to make two choices.
The way the question reads, at the onset, is pretty obvious. Of the three, who do you think will get the nomination. But then it asks you to pick the candidate who you think doesn't want to be the nominee (that's the "also vote for the one you think will win not want to win" part).
As if that would make any sense at all.
It's a poorly worded question, and is miles away from being straightforward...
Zionist Nationalist wrote:I said 3 main candidates remain at this point and you can choose only ONE who you THINK have the most chance to win the nominee not the one who you want to win (if you support the democrats)
Zionist Nationalist wrote:We have 3 main candidates at this point the rest are not relevant.
also vote for the one you think will win not want to win
Zionist Nationalist wrote:I think sanders is the only one that can beat Trump but I think they going to nominate Senile Joe
Sanders is 78 year old heart attack survivor if he gets elected he may not live to second term
Code Rood wrote:I'd like her to win too, but her chances are very slim since she seems to be the only sane person when it comes to foreign policy.
But anyway, it's probably going to be Warren. So in other words, a walk in the park for the Donald. Trump's luck is that he got impeached and that the main Democratic candidates are either insane or have one foot in the grave, else he would be annihilated.
@Potemkin Well, it's hard to argue with that, […]
Is it like stealing is superior to having money t[…]
The Empire strikes again: https://i.redd[…]
By who? Didn't you read your own news. A lot of[…]