[colliric]

This applies in the USA, UK, etc., too,

Nope. It's being called a Passport because unlike those, you're going to explicitly need to show it to travel overseas and also interstate.

That's the difference idiot. So let's not.

Let's force you to remember what you originally proposed it for.

Overseas travel.

Also:


Jews getting explicitly targeted by the media again. This is the third time.

Also you can buy a stick of gum anonymously. It's called Cash. You may have heard of it. What idiotic Canadian wrote that crap?

[Godstud]

Comparing an immunization record to the Holocaust?

@colliric You pathetic victim wannabe! Your hyperbole is beyond stupid.

[colliric]

Comparing an immunization record to the Holocaust?

@colliric You pathetic victim wannabe! Your hyperbole is beyond stupid.

You can purchase liquor without two forms of ID, in Australia you only need one, the same one you need to drive legally. You can also buy it illegally using fake IDs, through a proxy adult or on the black market. You can even make it yourself at home using all the correct ingredients. Once again the ease of this forced the US to abandon prohibition.

And you can buy Gum anonymously.

That person who wrote that is a fucking moron. It's called Cash. Next you'll say "you can still be traced, from the CCTV and your phone location", but that's besides the point. That is obviously talking about Eftpos(as we call then in Australia) transactions.

You can in fact drive without a licence and leave the country without a passport, but if you get caught you'll get in legal trouble.

Comparing an immunization record to the Holocaust?

You know that sometimes when people say "also" they are using it as an alternative word to "meanwhile" and "in other news", right?

This is the third such time during this pandemic that Orthodox or Hasidic Jews have been directly villified in the Victorian media. I will still up them when I believe they're being unfairly targeted. This was the Jewish New year and they wanted to meet in person. Can't there at least be some lenience in this? Can't they just, you know, not scapegoat them?

[Pants-of-dog]

Nope. It's being called a Passport because unlike those, you're going to explicitly need to show it to travel overseas and also interstate.

Actually, many places in the world require proof of vaccination for certain diseases before being allowed a visa to travel there.

Now you know!

[Pants-of-dog]

I already knew that

No.

If that were the case, you would not gave argued the exact opposite.

I ignored the insulting and irrelevant bits of your post.

[Godstud]

@colliric The moment you invoked "Godwin's Law" was the moment your entire argument was seen to be the shit that it really is.

Carrying proof of a vaccination is about the same as carrying ID. Is that small slip of paper really too much for your pathetically wimpy arms to carry?

[XogGyux]

If we must resort to cannibalism, I have a suggestion who should be the first volunteer.

[colliric]

No.

If that were the case, you would not gave argued the exact opposite.

I ignored the insulting and irrelevant bits of your post.

Nope.

Unlike you, I've got a brain and understand there is a difference between letting things over the border and stopping people from accessing basic services which are required for them to live a functional productive life. One is protecting the country from a foreign entity, the other is called locking people up in their home, demanding they confirm to Orwellian control techniques and denying them access to basic facilities over a virus that has something like a 1% kill rate(which go down over time with the advent of better treatment and drugs, hopefully like the Flu did). Some users even proposed killing them, in favour of vaccinated individuals.

The whole purpose of having borders is so that you can close them and stop alien viruses, organisms or animals, and in the old days Military Forces, from entering your country to begin with. Since your Government and my government, as well as the Chinese government, failed to do so on the advice of the WHO is the reason we have this pandemic right now.

If we must resort to cannibalism, I have a suggestion who should be the first volunteer.

Into whatsoever houses I enter, I will enter to help the sick, and I will abstain from all intentional wrong-doing and harm, especially from abusing the bodies of man or woman, bond or free.

Except unvaccinated sick houses and unvaccinated people. Because fuck them, kill them all.

[Pants-of-dog]

Nope.

Unlike you, I've got a brain and understand there is a difference between letting things over the boarder and stopping people from accessing basic services which are required for them to live a functional productive life. One is protecting the country from a foreign entity, the other is called locking people up in their home, demanding they confirm to Orwellian control techniques and denying them access to basic facilities over a virus that has something like a 1% kill rate(which go down over time with the advent of better treatment and drugs, hopefully like the Flu did). Some users even proposed killing them, in favour of vaccinated individuals.

The whole purpose of having borders is so that you can close them and stop alien viruses, organisms or animals, and in the old days Military Forces, from entering your country to begin with. Since your Government and my government, as well as the Chinese government, failed to do so on the advice of the WHO is the reason we have this pandemic right now.



Into whatsoever houses I enter, I will enter to help the sick, and I will abstain from all intentional wrong-doing and harm, especially from abusing the bodies of man or woman, bond or free.

Except unvaccinated sick houses and unvaccinated people. Because fuck them, kill them all.

Yes, really.

Everyone can read that you made the claim and are now pretending you said the exact opposite.

Having to show proof of vaccination to use certain institutions is a longstanding practice and is not a human rights violation.

Also, a boarder is someone who pays for lodging and food comes with it.

[Rancid]

I don't understand these people that yell "don't make me take the vaccine."

No one is making you take the vaccine. Where is this coming from? If people were being forced to take the vaccine, all of these people would be vaccinated.

[Igor Antunov]

Oh wait, excuse me, didn't see you there sitting in the back fellow dawg.

Anyway....as I was saying...



I'm like, totally like never gettin' jabbed

[Igor Antunov]

You fuckers look what you've done.




https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/0 ... nes-covid/

[Godstud]

Good tactic, @Igor Antunov. Use sources that other people can't read because they are behind paywalls.

[colliric]

Good tactic, @Igor Antunov. Use sources that other people can't read because they are behind paywalls.

Here dickhead:
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/do- ... oung-boys-

All you had to do was use Google News search.

[Rugoz]

Here dickhead:
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/do- ... oung-boys-

All you had to do was use Google News search.

Not peer reviewed. Compares "cardiac adverse reactions" with hospitalization. Doesn't compare deaths or damage to long-term health.

All that said, giving the vaccine to below 16-year olds is hardly a priority.

[B0ycey]

You fuckers look what you've done.




https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/0 ... nes-covid/

Well the threat of both is infinitesimally small and as such 6 times the rate of million to one is something like tens of thousands to one in any case. Even so I don't support youths getting the vaccine unless they have health concerns and I suspect there are many people like me who think the same given the risk of Covid is age dependent. I would rather those vaccines go to the rest of the world who are being left behind right now. But I do want to point out that vaccinating youths is not to prevent complications or death but to reduce long Covid as that is a problem for all ages as well as reducing the case rate or course. So there is logic to vaccinating everyone and really it all depends on what kind of risks people think are acceptable.

[AFAIK]

If you take a holistic view vaccination is worth it for teens @B0ycey. It reduces the risk of having to self-isolate due to contact with an infected person so they don't face the possibility of missing school. Of course from a holistic perspective there are 5 billion people on the planet who would benefit from a vaccine more than a teenager would.

[colliric]

I think that Rugoz made the argument for me, @colliric, you dickless imbecile.

Is your name Igor?

The article was specifically about the vaccines causing heart disease you Midwit.

It doesn't compare damage to long term health or death rate, simply because no time has passed meaning there is not enough data. Heart disease leads to deaths and complications later on, idiot.

You give a young boy heart disease, you've increased his chances of dying early from a heart attack. It's not worth the risk.

Interesting to see what health issues these kids have in the future, needs to be studied.

You never know when the next "government let them put Abestos in buildings fucking everywhere", "government allowed 'medical experts' to put Thalidomide in pregnant women!" scandal will happen.

[Godstud]

Again, @colliric, it's not been peer reviewed, imbecile. At this point it's a lot of opinion and assumptions.

Saying that people will have future heart disease from vaccines, is a whole lot of fantasizing. I can see why you'd be drawn to it.

[Rugoz]

It doesn't compare damage to long term health or death rate, simply because no time has passed meaning there is not enough data. Heart disease leads to deaths and complications later on, idiot.

Myocarditis can be mild or serious, just as other symptoms of a Covid infection can be mild or serious. The study is not a holistic assessement of the risk associated with vaccination versus that of a Covid infection.

Also peer-review shouldn't be dismissed so easily. Unlike clinical trials those studies are not "correct by design". I'm not an expert obviously but I imagine they're hard to get right, i.e. to rule out all cofounding factors.