If someone wishes to argue that Michelle Bachelet or any other political figure is a fascist or shows fascist behaviour, they are welcome to do so.
If someone wishes to provide evidence that socialists are secretly controlled by billionaire Jews, they are free to provide evidence. Please note that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a fabrication.
———————-
@Julian658
You are obviously trying very hard to take this thread off topic.
Can you name a single fascist nation that gave workers control of the means of production?
Do you know what I mean by “the means of production”?
Julian658 wrote:POD:
Nearly 100% of people agree that it is wrong to advocate ethnic nationalism on the right. That is a sharply demarcated NO-GO ZONE.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10. ... ode=rers20
ABSTRACT
In this article, we explore the ethno-nationalist populism of Donald Trump’s Twitter communication during the 2016 presidential campaign. We draw on insights from ethno-symbolism – a perspective within nationalism studies – to analyse all 5,515 tweets sent by Trump during the campaign. We find that ethno-nationalist and populist themes were by far the most important component of Trump’s tweets, and that these themes built upon long-standing myths and symbols of an ethnic conception of American identity. In sum, Trump’s tweets depicted a virtuous white majority being threatened by several groups of immoral outsiders, who were identified by their foreignness, their religion, and their self-interestedness. The struggle against these groups was framed as a mission to restore America to a mythical golden age – to “Make America Great Again.”
So Trump often uses ethnic nationalism as a theme in his Twitter writing, and his supporters either do not see it or accept it. And this use of ethnic nationalist themes helps him get support. So his advocacy of ethnic nationalism is seen as a good thing by his supporters and definitely not seen as a “NO GO ZONE”.
————————-
Unthinking Majority wrote:I agree that federally right now you have alt-right white nationalists controlling the White House/executive branch, and this is dangerous.
And yet we see the US public not doing a thing about it. Thye even let Trump get away with ignoring congressional oversight.
In the meantime, far-left extremists have been burning and looting cities. In far-left cities like Seattle and Portland the mayor and city council does nothing but enable them. California is going straight bonkers. Our academic institutions are being co-opted by far-left activists. There is no argument to be made that both the far-right and far-left have been on a major rise the last 5 to 7 years or so.
Of course since you're a far-left ideologue you'll obviously disagree with me and defend the far-left as usual. I can harp all day how bad the far-right are, it doesn't matter to you. Your biases make you unable to look at things objectively, you will keep giving the far left a pass because they pursue your aims. This changes nothing.
This is off topic, mostly incorrect, and a personal attack. Ignored.
Unthinking Majority wrote:Imagine if the mayor of Nashville, TN allowed far-right rioters to burn down buildings and loot businesses and block traffic in protest of ie: Obamacare, and refused to lay charges, refused to bring in the National Guard if Obama wanted them to go in.
Anyways you're wasting your breath, might as well talk to a wall.
Right wingers did take over and vandalise an area for a while a few ears ago. They even shot a cop. The only person who was charged was the guy who shot a cop despite the fact that they threatened some people and broke many laws.
The cops let a young man who killed someone walk right by them despite the fact that he was holding the murder weapon and people were telling the cops to arrest him.
Another cop killed a black man in broad daylight in front of witnesses and other coos just kept civilians away during that time.
A convoy of care drove into a city and shot protesters with paintballs. No one was charged.
You have the Boogaloo Bots shooting cops and Trump turning around and accusing rioters of burning down cities, i.e. the same accusations you make.
The main difference between these actual crimes I listed and the vague threats of Antifa that you bring up (other than the obvious fact that mine are real while your fears are not) is that all of these actions have the support of the White House, or at least a lack of condemnation.
Unthinking Majority wrote:@Pants-of-dog do you think some of the far-left protestors in Seattle, Portland etc should be allowed to burn down buildings, loot businesses, block traffic, and assume control part of a downtown core (like CHOP)? Yes or no.
POD do you think far-right protestors etc should be allowed to burn down buildings, loot businesses, block traffic, and assume control part of a downtown core ? Yes or no.
Assume the worst of me, if you wish. You can allow yourself to think that I am an evil anarchist, arsonist, thief, jaywalker, and oppressor.
Please note that even if I am all of these things, all my arguments are still just as right as if I were a perfect angel.