- 20 Jul 2019 16:33
#15019649
I hope I don't accidentally refresh this.
No not really generally because there is no group of people strong enough to enforce it. If people are determined to reject your claims of property, especially in an anarchist society, there is no amount of people capable of doing so.
It requires people to respect those property rights which requires consent.
Thieves exist when basic needs aren't available which they would in an anarchist society due to the proper distribution of collective force i.e. other communities or unions sharing the resources they lack in exchange for aid when they themselves are in need.
Thievery won't exist in the same level as it does in anarchist societies. In Syria now there is a big thief problem and 9/10 they're usually poor young men or children who need to make money but can't by conventional means.
1. No it is. In fact hierarchy has been proven to be completely inefficient in the complexities of modern society.
2. Yes it would. Anarchism is the opposite of hierarchy. It's literally in the etymology of the name.
Dude, it still only shows tribes from the 19th century. If they had archeological evidence from before that wouldn't you think they'd put it in?
Rugoz wrote:Private property can be guaranteed by any group of people who is strong enough to enforce it.
No not really generally because there is no group of people strong enough to enforce it. If people are determined to reject your claims of property, especially in an anarchist society, there is no amount of people capable of doing so.
It requires people to respect those property rights which requires consent.
Thieves exist as long as there's scarcity and people desire what others have. I'm sure they've existed in every society ever.
Thieves exist when basic needs aren't available which they would in an anarchist society due to the proper distribution of collective force i.e. other communities or unions sharing the resources they lack in exchange for aid when they themselves are in need.
Thievery won't exist in the same level as it does in anarchist societies. In Syria now there is a big thief problem and 9/10 they're usually poor young men or children who need to make money but can't by conventional means.
Some hierarchy is unavoidable in a complex society, but even if it weren't hierarchical, that wouldn't make it anarchist.
1. No it is. In fact hierarchy has been proven to be completely inefficient in the complexities of modern society.
2. Yes it would. Anarchism is the opposite of hierarchy. It's literally in the etymology of the name.
That was only a single slide. There are others based on archeological evidence, showing the same picture. Under the link I posted.
Dude, it still only shows tribes from the 19th century. If they had archeological evidence from before that wouldn't you think they'd put it in?