- 02 Feb 2011 20:49
#13617768
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_business_cycle_theory
Do libertarians on this forum agree with this explanation for the business cycle? If so, which theory is better, the Austrian Business Cycle Theory or this one?
Real business cycle theory (RBC theory) are a class of macroeconomic models in which business cycle fluctuations to a large extent can be accounted for by real (in contrast to nominal) shocks. Unlike other leading theories of the business cycle, RBC theory sees recessions and periods of economic growth as the efficient response to exogenous changes in the real economic environment. That is, the level of national output necessarily maximizes expected utility, and government should therefore concentrate on the long-run structural policy changes and not intervene through discretionary fiscal or monetary policy designed to actively smooth out economic short-term fluctuations.
According to RBC theory, business cycles are therefore "real" in that they do not represent a failure of markets to clear but rather reflect the most efficient possible operation of the economy, given the structure of the economy. RBC theory differs in this way from other theories of the business cycle such as Keynesian economics and Monetarism that see recessions as the failure of some market to clear.
RBC theory is associated with freshwater economics (the Chicago school of economics in the neoclassical tradition).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_business_cycle_theory
Do libertarians on this forum agree with this explanation for the business cycle? If so, which theory is better, the Austrian Business Cycle Theory or this one?