Pants-of-dog wrote:Because all of the scientific evidence contradicts your claims (including the evidence that you have provided),
Again, that is just baldly false.
you are now arguing that all the studies and data have been doctored
No, only the ones that have. Obviously, if all the data had been doctored, there would be no way to judge which data might be reliable.
and that only your direct perceptions can be considered trustworthy.
No, all readers'.
This is a red herring.
Self-referential but admirably accurate.
Since you cannot support your claims,
I have. As you know.
you instead attack a strawman: the false and vague claim that environmental activists are arguing that we are in a current climate crisis
That is neither vague nor false.
and you get to decide what they mean by “crisis”.
My point is precisely that they are using the word dishonestly.
Quote the relevant text, showing how sea level rise is not accelerating.
"Over the past five years, NASA has lowered 1930-2000 sea level rise rates, and then introduced a post-1993 hockey stick at the end. This makes it look like sea level is rising faster now."
"If sea level rise rates were accelerating, tide gauge graphs around the world would be non-linear with an upwards curvature. Water seeks a level surface, so any nonlinear “response” would be seen globally. There is no evidence this is occurring."
Also, you never explained how your wikipedia graph disproved the study about how Greenland glaciers are melting more rapidly than ever.