Climate change causes and impacts are accelerating, experts warn - Page 8 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Pollution, global warming, urbanisation etc.
Forum rules: No one line posts please.
#15056205
Pants-of-dog wrote:@Truth To Power

I think you need to read it.

I did.
When you have, you can quote the relevant text,

I did.
and then provide additional evidence as needed.

I've provided all the evidence needed.
BeesKnee5 wrote:Let me help you.

So you still refuse to read the link. Thought so.
Pick one

http://uhslc.soest.hawaii.edu/data/?fd
http://www.ioc-sealevelmonitoring.org/list.php
https://www.psmsl.org/data/high_frequency/table.php

Then you can show us how these three independent sea level monitoring organisations support your claim.

What on earth do you even incorrectly imagine you think you might be talking about? I invite readers to peruse your links and confirm they have nothing relevant to say.
#15056272
Truth To Power wrote:So you still refuse to read the link. Thought so.

You may want to beleive this if you wish.
You'd be wrong.
Let's take an example:
The article claims Hansen showing a lower sea level rise than tide gauges. It quotes Gornitz 1982.
Problem is the Gornitz paper isn't showing the calculated sea level rise by Hansen, only the effect of thermal expansion ( so sea level rise from Ice melt is not included) .
Image
You'd know this if you didn't just blindly believe the article and instead did the remotest bit of investigation yourself.

Truth To Power wrote:What on earth do you even incorrectly imagine you think you might be talking about? I invite readers to peruse your links and confirm they have nothing relevant to say.


It's ok for you to admit you were wrong and have no evidence to support your claim.

No point trying to deflect now, you're too far gone.

So let's have a recap of your nonsense
1. A claim that sea level rise hasn't continued in recent years.
2. Chart supplied that doesn't support the claim, quite the reverse as it shows sea level rise has accelerated.
3. A claim that the chart supplied as evidence has been doctored by NASA
4. A refusal to support the claim NASA is to blame.
5. The above deflection.

I have provided you with several non NASA sources to assist in your quest to prove points 1 and 3. You can use them if you wish to show some understanding, or you can come up with something of your own so that we can all have a laugh.
  • 1
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8

And you wonder why conservatives and libertarians[…]

This is fucking disgusting. Hard times bring out […]

Jacinda vs ScoMo

I agree with Ardern. Traditionally Australia and N[…]

There's definitely a difference between austerity […]