- 29 Oct 2021 20:18
#15196333
No, that is just more false, absurd, and disingenuous nonscience from you. You have just stated that before the Internet existed, there were never any facts. It's just silly, laughable, puerile noise.
I have identified a causal mechanism. Your claim that that is not a theory is just a bald falsehood.
Your claim is false. I have supported my statements with relevant facts of objective physical reality and identified their logical implications.
And I have explained how it happened.
If you consider question-begging computer models, post hoc fallacies, censorship and suppression of dissenting views, and systematically falsified data more convincing than actual physical events.
Pants-of-dog wrote:@Truth To Power
Until you provide links to pert reviewed studies to support your claims, your arguments are not facts,
No, that is just more false, absurd, and disingenuous nonscience from you. You have just stated that before the Internet existed, there were never any facts. It's just silly, laughable, puerile noise.
They are not even theories.
I have identified a causal mechanism. Your claim that that is not a theory is just a bald falsehood.
At best, they are unsupported hypotheses.
Your claim is false. I have supported my statements with relevant facts of objective physical reality and identified their logical implications.
Global warming is a fact.
And I have explained how it happened.
Anthropogenic climate change is a well supported theory.
If you consider question-begging computer models, post hoc fallacies, censorship and suppression of dissenting views, and systematically falsified data more convincing than actual physical events.