- 05 Apr 2022 03:43
#15221141
Will politicians listen to climate change warnings? In the US, IMO, no way in hell. YMMV
.
.
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Steve_American wrote:Will politicians listen to climate change warnings? In the US, IMO, no way in hell. YMMV
Truth To Power wrote:Good. Climate change nonscience is destroying Germany's economy to no purpose. The IPCC's warnings have all been nothing but absurd and objectively groundless hysteria mongering. One of the characteristic features of scams is extreme urgency: you have to act now, without thinking, reflecting, or getting any information from anywhere or anyone else. That's anti-fossil-fuel hysteria to a T.
Truth To Power wrote:Good. Climate change nonscience is destroying Germany's economy to no purpose. The IPCC's warnings have all been nothing but absurd and objectively groundless hysteria mongering. One of the characteristic features of scams is extreme urgency: you have to act now, without thinking, reflecting, or getting any information from anywhere or anyone else. That's anti-fossil-fuel hysteria to a T.
The next few years are critical, say the researchers, because if emissions aren't curbed by 2030, it will make it nigh on impossible to limit warming later this century.
BlutoSays wrote:Then it's never. OK, now we can move on to more important narratives.
Pants-of-dog wrote:...except we have been debating it since Dr. Hansen first testified about anthropogenic climate change.
It is true that the most recent report has been demanding the most urgent action, but this is true for all the reports.
This is because the deadline for actions keeps approaching and therefore there is less time and more need for urgency.
This ongoing pattern of escalating urgency actually corroborates the claim of anthropogenic climate change.
Steve_American wrote:Lurkers, I and others on this site have already proven that he is just wrong.
He keeps coming back to make his baseless assertions as if they are facts.
Truth To Power wrote:No, you have not been debating it since that time. You have merely been claiming the debate is over, and screaming for immediate, drastic action without any further debate, discussion or thought.
Bingo. They have all screamed for immediate, drastic action. The classic characteristic of a scam.
Except that there is no credible empirical evidence -- none -- that there is any such deadline or urgency.
No, it only confirms that the whole thing is an exercise in gaslighting.
Pants-of-dog wrote:This is all just an ad hominem directed at anyone who disagrees with your idea that climate change is a hoax.
I do not think this accusation of hysteria and gaslighting is true.
BlutoSays wrote:Climate change: Where the weather is always your fault
and the only solution is more socialism.
Pants-of-dog wrote:This is all just an ad hominem directed at anyone who disagrees with your idea that climate change is a hoax.
I do not think this accusation of hysteria and gaslighting is true.
Having said all that, it seems that politicians agree with you that we should do nothing about it even if they agree with me that the science shows that ACC is real and dangerous.
BlutoSays wrote:I admit it. I have no tolerance for your bullshit and manufactured lies.
[img]https://i.po[==]stimg.cc/x8fmfdPQ/FG-iz-Ql-X0-A0-DTt-T.jpg[/img]
Students can protest on campus, but they can't jus[…]
how 'the mismeasure of man' was totally refuted.[…]
I saw this long opinion article from The Telegraph[…]