Porn can be banned as effectively as alcohol was in the US prohibition days, or prostitution has disappeared because someone made it illegal.
Banning pornography is a pipe dream by puritan morons.
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Pants-of-dog wrote:No. The ones who evolved traits that make them able to survive and reproduce are the ones who survive, reproduce, and pass on these evolved traits.
It has nothing to do with purpose.
Please note that all organisms that use sexual reproduction have evolved to survive and reproduce. Using your logic, all of these organisms are sexual objects.
If you want to consider earthworms, marijuana plants, and me as sex objects, go ahead.
Truth to power wrote:The human female, almost uniquely among all animals, has evolved to engage in much more non-reproductive than reproductive sex. This non-reproductive sexual activity has no purpose but the sexual gratification of the male.This is your OPINION. Would you care to support this with some facts, or a source, please?
Truth To Power wrote:You are equivocating on the words, "to" and "purpose." "To" in this sense means having as a result, not as a goal, and "purpose" means function, not design or direction.
No, that's just more garbage from you. The human female, almost uniquely among all animals, has evolved to engage in much more non-reproductive than reproductive sex. This non-reproductive sexual activity has no purpose but the sexual gratification of the male.
Try not to be so obtuse.
Godstud wrote:This is your OPINION.
Would you care to support this with some facts, or a source, please?
Note: The science seems against such a "uniqueness", and turfs your idea pretty readily.
It is often assumed that animals do not have sex for pleasure, or alternatively that humans, pigs, bonoboes (and perhaps dolphins and one or two more species of primates) are the only species that do. This is sometimes stated as "animals mate only for reproduction". This view is considered a misconception by some scholars.
Jonathan Balcombe argues that the prevalence of non-reproductive sexual behaviour in certain species suggests that sexual stimulation is pleasurable. He also points to the presence of the clitoris in some female mammals, and evidence for female orgasm in primates.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_sexual_behaviourDo Animals Have Sex for Fun
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/2014061 ... ex-for-fun
Truth to power wrote:Yes, and I hold that opinion because it is true.Truth is very subjective, and often an opinion. Facts are not.
Godstud wrote:Banning pornography is a pipe dream by puritan morons.
blackjack21 wrote:Women aren't equal and pornography isn't degrading.Do you have something to actually say, or is the usual trolling fuckery you do?
blackjack21 wrote:Right. Women aren't equal and pornography isn't degrading. It's just showing nature in its true form.
blackjack21 wrote:Obviously, you missed the sarcasm, and you just pointed out yourself a significant difference between women and men. Why the obsession with equality?
Hong Wu wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/10/opinion/sunday/lets-ban-porn.html?rref=collection%2Fissuecollection%2Ftodays-new-york-times
It's a good article, I suggest people read it before commenting.
We seem to be moving past extreme freedom of speech in the west. The left wants speech controls more than the right does. At what point, in terms of the social problems it engenders, does porn become classified more akin to "shouting fire in a crowded theatre" than as expression? I've always found the argument that porn is expressive or makes a statement to be facetious anyway.
SSDR wrote:Most forms of pornography should be banned because it makes women look like sex objects. It also promotes men to be more masculine, in terms of genital size, muscularity, and even physical height. A hyper sexualized culture makes society more competitive, thus alienating people socially. That would manipulate people to socially compete against each other. People would value each other according to who they have sex with, and how many sex partners they had.
The only kinds of pornography that should not be banned are - Femdom, and Educational.
Educational pornography would teach those who lack satisfying sexual experience on how to improve their sexual activities.
Femdom is the only kind of pornography that interests me. Femdom helps destroy sexual patriarchy, which psychologically and sub consciously alienates people.
Hindsite wrote:I enjoy looking at beautiful naked women with sexy bodies, especially those with well formed breasts.This is one of those few times when I agree with you, and that the HalleluYah is warranted.
Tainari88 wrote:Not as visual as men and with a different response always.
Tainari88 wrote:History bends on the left over time. You shall see.
Tainari88 wrote:How are you doing today Relampaguito? A relaxed Sunday eh? I am considering driving to the beach and spending all day there.
blackjack21 wrote:Communism has proven to be a pretty persistent failure everywhere it is tried.Socialism has not, however, and Socialism ≠ Communism, except in the minds of the illiterate and uneducated.
SueDeNîmes wrote: But the quantity they have to b[…]
Imagine freely and willingly giving someone somet[…]
I'm not surprised banks are cheerfully doing more […]
I do not involve myself in Thai politics. I canno[…]