Rand Paul's Senate speech against COVID-19 bill - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

"It's the economy, stupid!"

Moderator: PoFo Economics & Capitalism Mods

Forum rules: No one line posts please.
#15144670


Conservative Libertarian Rand Paul spoke against the COVID-19 bill, speaking against the economic ideas and mentality behind this type of spending, and calling Republicans in his Party hypocrites.


US lawmakers have reached a deal for a $900 billion relief package for the coronavirus pandemic and associated shutdown.
Where is this money going to come from?

The annual US budget is $4.79 trillion.

Just to put that into perspective, $900 billion is nearly 19 percent of $4.79 trillion.

The US already has way too much debt already.

This $900 billion package includes $600 billion in direct payments to Americans and $300 in enhanced unemployment for the next 10 weeks, according to House Speaker Nancy Speaker and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.
The deal also includes $25 billion in direct rental assistance and extends the eviction moratorium, $82 billion for education funding, $45 billion for public transit systems and $13 billion for increased food stamps and child nutrition benefits. There were also benefits for small business owners, including $12 billion for minority-owned or very small business, plus $15 billion for theater operators and small venue owners through Save our Stages Act.


You'll notice Rand Paul specifically goes out of his way in the speech to lambast the economic theory of MMT.


Some day - it might not be soon, could be decades longer - people like Rand Paul are going to be proved right. The US will end up in a nasty financial situation, perhaps an imminent debt crisis.
Where suddenly the US will need large amounts of money to pay off its debt and no one else will want to continue to lend. This could lead to sudden huge levels of inflation, devastating to the economy, or it could permanently ruin the credit rating of the country. Meaning if there's a future war or emergency, the country won't be able to borrow. Probably would cause all sorts of other bad stuff that I am not going to go into here.
#15145492
You all not be surprised that I, as an MMTer, think Rand Paul is a kook.

MMT says that the so-called national debt as such is really the assets of the American people.
That the American people took dollars for their work or stuff. To tax those dollars away is not fair, unless there is no alternative.
Imagine that the Gov. printed special blue dollar bills and said that in 10 years it would tax the then current holder of them to take them back. IMHO, such dollars would be discounted especially as the crunch date approached. Just taking those dollars away would be very unfair, right? And, stupid.
Now that the US Gov. is off the gold standard, Rand Paul needs to adapt to the new reality.

Also, people who don't need the $600 dollars can give them to charity, those who do need them and are working can think of them as 'hero pay', those who are not working need them. Paying them to everyone is far cheaper than deciding who should get them. Like a comp. not worrying about workers stealing a few boxes of paper clips.
.

Wishing Georgia and Georgians success as they seek[…]

Great german commentary: https://www.nachdenkseit[…]

Hmm. I took it a second time and changes three ans[…]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

is it you , Moscow Marjorie ? https://exte[…]