- 11 Dec 2012 04:45
#14126883
There is no guarantee in life, but no one is discussing hoisting some secretive coven of a few "elite" men and women on top of the pedestal of power in a nation-state. Fascism is a mass action, populist, popular movement. The groundwork must often be laid by a legionnaire of sorts, a political soldier willing to dedicate mind, body, and soul to such a cause, such as Corneliu Zelea Codreanu and his heroically defiant Iron Guard were in Romania.
[youtube]rWQkAfSLSLA[/youtube]
It's a common misnomer what you are saying about the power abuse of some supposedly rogue elite. To the extent that leaders of fascist states were "elites" (and I do not consider them this - it was Hitler himself who said "I am nothing but your speaker"), they were not corrupt, nor was power abused for selfish ends; quite the contrary. Totalitarian states, in direct contrast to authoritarian entities, are typically marked with extremely low levels of corruption. Far less corruption was present in National Socialist Germany, Fascist Italy, and Imperial Japan than one would find in many authoritarian states formerly around in Eastern Europe, in the Middle East, in Africa, etc. And far less corruption than modern liberal democracies within the West.
It should first be emphasized that ārya simply translates from the Sanskrit language to English as "noble". Would you not desire noble people leading every society on earth to its greatest heights, tapping into absolute native potential to furnish the ascendant path? National Socialism stressed ethnic German nationalism which extended in part to an elevated European and global position for the Germanic peoples (the Dutch, Norwegians, Danes, Swedes, etc.) because National Socialism was a German fascism. Within Italian fascism, the direction of ethnic nationalism clearly took a different course. A National Socialist movement could theoretically arise in Somalia or Kenya as it has everywhere else from Syria to Argentina. It would simply adapt to local concerns.
I realize this question was addressed to Figlio, but I also wanted to chime in to state unequivocally: Absolutely.
Atheism is a degenerate ideology not concerned with broader reality or preparing men in the long term for poking holes through to the next level of consciousness and laying the groundwork for the crowning moment of mass self-realization on this planet. Fascism and atheism are as incompatible as fascism and capitalism, fascism and Marxian socialism, fascism and base individualistic hedonism (libertarianism), etc.
Except that all too often the aristocracy just hoards the best resources and knowledge from the masses. How would The Great Work guarantee that the leaders will act in the best interests of the group?
There is no guarantee in life, but no one is discussing hoisting some secretive coven of a few "elite" men and women on top of the pedestal of power in a nation-state. Fascism is a mass action, populist, popular movement. The groundwork must often be laid by a legionnaire of sorts, a political soldier willing to dedicate mind, body, and soul to such a cause, such as Corneliu Zelea Codreanu and his heroically defiant Iron Guard were in Romania.
[youtube]rWQkAfSLSLA[/youtube]
It's a common misnomer what you are saying about the power abuse of some supposedly rogue elite. To the extent that leaders of fascist states were "elites" (and I do not consider them this - it was Hitler himself who said "I am nothing but your speaker"), they were not corrupt, nor was power abused for selfish ends; quite the contrary. Totalitarian states, in direct contrast to authoritarian entities, are typically marked with extremely low levels of corruption. Far less corruption was present in National Socialist Germany, Fascist Italy, and Imperial Japan than one would find in many authoritarian states formerly around in Eastern Europe, in the Middle East, in Africa, etc. And far less corruption than modern liberal democracies within the West.
Then what about Aryanism and the Aryan peoples are better than everyone else and should rule?
It should first be emphasized that ārya simply translates from the Sanskrit language to English as "noble". Would you not desire noble people leading every society on earth to its greatest heights, tapping into absolute native potential to furnish the ascendant path? National Socialism stressed ethnic German nationalism which extended in part to an elevated European and global position for the Germanic peoples (the Dutch, Norwegians, Danes, Swedes, etc.) because National Socialism was a German fascism. Within Italian fascism, the direction of ethnic nationalism clearly took a different course. A National Socialist movement could theoretically arise in Somalia or Kenya as it has everywhere else from Syria to Argentina. It would simply adapt to local concerns.
Figlio, would you say that fascism and atheism are incompatible?
I realize this question was addressed to Figlio, but I also wanted to chime in to state unequivocally: Absolutely.
Atheism is a degenerate ideology not concerned with broader reality or preparing men in the long term for poking holes through to the next level of consciousness and laying the groundwork for the crowning moment of mass self-realization on this planet. Fascism and atheism are as incompatible as fascism and capitalism, fascism and Marxian socialism, fascism and base individualistic hedonism (libertarianism), etc.
"I am never guided by a possible assessment of my work" - President Vladimir Putin
"Nations whose nationalism is destroyed are subject to ruin." - Muammar Qaddafi
"Nations whose nationalism is destroyed are subject to ruin." - Muammar Qaddafi