- 31 Jul 2013 20:37
#14281801
I do not think that any nation is hopeless to change; however, I think that some nations do require a lot more effort than others to become changed. - Verv
I agree with you Pot, about papacy its really hard to tell, they had the will to spread european culture which was chirstianity at that time but they had no will to unify europe itself into 1 people of sorts as Machiavelli pointed it out in regards to italy.
In all honest Napoleon wasnt that significant in that regard, he was spreading the Revolution and thats about it, papacy did a far better job. Simply put the papacy had the means but not the will, while napoleon had the will but used the wrong means.
Napoleon did it , just not for long.
In all honest Napoleon wasnt that significant in that regard, he was spreading the Revolution and thats about it, papacy did a far better job. Simply put the papacy had the means but not the will, while napoleon had the will but used the wrong means.
I do not think that any nation is hopeless to change; however, I think that some nations do require a lot more effort than others to become changed. - Verv