ThirdTerm wrote:The Aussie girl is an active participant of a far-right protest, where all kinds of foul words can be heard, which makes us question her upbringing.
What about her feeling of a necessity to do something about the situation? It’s true that foul language can be used on these marches, but this is no different to a liberal screaming profanities on one of their so called “anti-Fascist” demonstrations. Even though right wing organisations can have loads of mindless idiots in them (as can anti-Fascist ones) many intelligent people that join feel as though there is no other option for them, fight or be treated unjustly.
ThirdTerm wrote:In William Manchester's two-volume biography of Churchill, there is a revealing chapter about Australia, explaining its roughish thug culture by linking it to the nation's founding as a convict colony.
Yes this makes sense for the very early period, but many non-criminals arrived after the first settlers and we’re talking about a period of over 200 years. Pointing out some book that says Australians are thugs isn’t really proof that this girl is one. She has legitimate concerns and you have no reason to suspect she is anything but respectable.
ThirdTerm wrote:As the Colonial Secretary, Churchill did not allow the Boers to deprive British Asians of their voting rights in colonial South Africa and the Boers' white nationalism was somewhat checked while South Africa was a British colony (i.e. there was no apartheid.)
Churchill hated the Boers, they tried to kill him and he later saw many of them put in concentration camps. How many British Asians were there in South Africa anyway? I’d say if this is true, it was only out of wanting to oppose Boer policy. You might want to read some of the things he said and did against the colonial people (although at times he was quite benevolent and wanted to make them become more “civilised”- most modern liberals thinking this is still an outrage)
ThirdTerm wrote:Moreover, Churchill was 1/16 Cherokee from his American mother's side and non-European haplogroups such as Q or C could be detected in his direct descendants, which may be why Churchill supported civil rights for civilised Africans (i.e. rich and educated.)
I’ve got doubts Churchill actually knew about any of this (if it’s true). I just Googled the native American thing and saw it called a "myth" or “alleged” quite a few times. Which civil rights for civilised Africans do you mean? There was a famine in India once and the British were asking Churchill to send food that area - Churchill apparently sneered at them and told them it was their own fault for breeding like rabbits. According to an Independent article I just read, 3 million of them starved to death. It also tells us that he wanted to see poison gas used on Kurds.