@Sivad
Do you like Nick Land's writings? I admire his style and delivery, but I disagree with some of his philosophy. Now, I'm not overly-familiar with his body of work, so please keep that in mind...
The 'dominion of capital' is an accomplished teleological catastrophe, robot rebellion, or shoggothic insurgency, through which intensively escalating instrumentality has inverted all natural purposes into a monstrous reign of the tool. Interesting, I too see the externalization of human technology as a side-effect of our mind/matter feedback loop, and as I study concepts such as
'Media and Formal Cause,' which had been proposed by Marshall & son Eric McLuhan, and the
'Morphic Resonance' theory explored by Rupert Sheldrake, I understand how a techno-catastrophe could appear before our intellect as one teleological sequence unfolding through the human interface. Nonetheless, to say-
nothing human makes it out of the future, would seem somewhat presumptuous and inarticulate, since any tool or technology must be an extension or externalization of the biological organism responsible for its manifestation, thus calling it a catastrophe would be a self-referential conclusion (remember, a perpetual motion or evolution scheme does not produce
'conclusions.'), suggesting that the process of
'being human' has a predefined boundary or limit (quantitative/qualitative preconception). See, if we're in-fact involuntary instruments being played by an omnipresent evolutionary scheme, and our tools create depth inside the existential field of dimensional sensation, I think our future would be very human, because the tools we're creating tend to be manifestations of human perception. Also, as far as
accelerationism goes- perhaps the 3-dimensional quickening is an active part of an evolutionary unfolding~ing~ing and the hyperspace humans create, through things like the inner-net, produce neo-trajectory patterns which encompass unique space-time relations (trans-dimensional collision of energy/signals/information in evolutionary motion, creating internal/external dialogue through an eternal present called NOW) that reside in a technological noosphere (within) and
bleed-through our physical reality(without). It's the relative translation of phenomena, for
I am closer to the end than I am to the beginning, because to live is to die and to be is to do, so human emanations flow forward as genetic information in order to restructure consciousness as a new expression of consciousness as we unknowingly participate in a cosmic
'happening' that must create new folds within its ever-expanding parameters, like a holographic snowball effect, rolling or unfolding indeterminately so it can sustain its primordial consciousness. Alas, how would a human mind realize or rationalize such things when we're consciousness having a human experience, with our observation(s) being limited by the nature of dimensional entanglement?
inverted all natural purposes, Perhaps this is a value judgment based upon Land's spectrum of existential awareness and physical priorities. If the process unfolded in reverse, the inversion would be a return to all natural purposes. In other words, If humans are enfolded in an unfolding, a value judgment would be a side-effect of an individual's perspective. Does water go down the drain, or does it go up the drain, and is up or down a good or bad thing?
The human mind is a linear operator, practical, and completely enveloped in a polycentric cloud of sensation.
As far as the
'surface symptoms' go (things we can investigate through our scientific and technological 'genius'), I admire Land's assumptions concerning the material plane... I for one entertain a more transcendental approach, avoiding the idea that one can fully
'know' or realize the things going on inside this 3D world. What does Nick Land think about free-will, is it a vector scenario, one involved reaction to the relatively independent positioning of an entity inside space-time? That's my hangup, how does free-will work in a teleological unfolding~ing~ing? Can we stop discovering new ways of obsolescing ourselves, or is this scenario our predetermined evolutionary purpose? Are we like sea-turtles crawling toward the ocean, returning to the void or sea-change vortex, living a curious life, from whence we came we shall return?