One Degree wrote:Sounds like a recipe for decadence and perversion.
Only if you are decadent and perverse to begin with.
One Degree wrote: The elimination of restraints on our actions usually brings out the more undesirable side of humans. We need to be restrained by society and limited wealth.
It can also bring out the best in people.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/peop ... 57046.htmlOne Degree wrote: I would give enough to my kids to have a greater freedom of choice, yet not enough to eliminate their need to make choices. You always allow them to make choices.
Wealth allows a greater number of choices, as money isn't a constraint.You have a very odd impression of what wealth can do.
One Degree wrote:I have zero desire to keep more than a $100,000 for myself.
It's not just about "yourself" but friends and family. I suppose, if you were a very selfish person, you might just spend it all on yourself, but few of us are like that.
Also, $100,000 doesn't make you rich. That'd simply be a windfall. Over $1,000,000 and you're talking about some wealth.
One Degree wrote:I have known a few that can handle wealth, but not many.
I doubt very much that you've known ANY that have had any real wealth.
“Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.” ― Ralph Waldo Emerson