- 21 Jul 2018 16:49
#14934513
She was fired for violating the companies policies. If she hadn't have violated them, I doubt a customer would have taken a photo and complained online. You can debate whether this is fair or not. You cannot debate the reason she was fired.
Even a culprit has rights. If their childhood has any bearing in their sentence, your feelings are irrelevant. This has nothing to do with righteousness. It is the legal system. I suspect if you were on death for you'd want your rights honoured. Especially if it was a miscarriage of justice with evidence not being provide in your trial. But he glad you live in USA @One Degree, as every other western nation abolished executions.
One Degree wrote:She was fired for getting media attention. That’s all it takes today. Ostracism by twitter is our new legal system.
She was fired for violating the companies policies. If she hadn't have violated them, I doubt a customer would have taken a photo and complained online. You can debate whether this is fair or not. You cannot debate the reason she was fired.
It is definitely self righteous nonsense to believe criminals should be considered victims of their childhood. Duh, well raised people seldom commit violent crimes. Criminals are a threat that any sane person should want eliminated, not excused. Virtually every horrific crime in the news is committed by a serial offender that the self righteous believed deserved another chance. It is insane to promote returning criminals to society. They don’t go to prison in the first place until they have had multiple chances. 40% are sociopaths.
Even a culprit has rights. If their childhood has any bearing in their sentence, your feelings are irrelevant. This has nothing to do with righteousness. It is the legal system. I suspect if you were on death for you'd want your rights honoured. Especially if it was a miscarriage of justice with evidence not being provide in your trial. But he glad you live in USA @One Degree, as every other western nation abolished executions.