- 20 Mar 2019 18:54
#14995028
It was ruled by a communist party staffed exclusively by communists. "communism" isn't anything at all, it is a barely described utopian state whose only function is as bait for the steel trap of socialism. It is a scam actually and it is the same scam then as now.
It is applicable to tax because a non aggressive transaction is one in which both parties consent.
The solution to 1984 is 1973!
B0ycey wrote:Well even the SU didn't call themselves Communist as it was a Social Republic FYI. Whether there is a few delusionists on PoFo who consider the SU a Communist state and that proves is they obviously don't understand what Communism is. So no, I don't buy your BS.
It was ruled by a communist party staffed exclusively by communists. "communism" isn't anything at all, it is a barely described utopian state whose only function is as bait for the steel trap of socialism. It is a scam actually and it is the same scam then as now.
B0ycey wrote:Although the Non Aggressive Principle is clearly nothing to do with deciding not to pay tax for the benefits of society - especially if you agree to the social contract as you live within it and haven't decided to become an outlaw instead. VS accepts payment in Dollars so obviously accepts the rules of his state in accordance to their economic system BTW. Although I do find the irony somewhat amusing when someone who is against paying tax for welfare is currently on welfare because he paid tax (the whole point of tax for welfare I suppose). Talk about standing up for your values.
It is applicable to tax because a non aggressive transaction is one in which both parties consent.
The solution to 1984 is 1973!