- 09 Aug 2019 05:54
#15024783
@Palmyrene
Depends on how you look at it.
But generally, they were all part of the same era and without the Napoleonic reign, modern France wouldn't exist since Napoleon established the common law in France.
Sure, but such discussions don't really go anywhere since both of these are highly complex topics.
Naah, just the thesis statement of the thread. LoL
Sure, but if they just happened to be born into it, then they usually don't often end up following it, atleast not to the fullest extent.
Basic principles are adhered to by an ideology's true followers, and those usually the ones who end up taking control since they're the ones with enough zeal to go the extra mile.
That is why in a discussion about Islamic terrorism, you can't take theology out of it; The ones who drive it are taking power because they're the ones willing to go the extra mile and enforce the basic principles to the letter.
This is perhaps the key point that it seems not fully communicated in this discussion; The regular man's experience is generally irrelevant since he\she is not in power, nor will they be as they don't have the sufficient ideological drive to do what it takes.
OLX.
You can get a basic laptop for 40-50$ (Used though).
It'll serve you better.
Making the claim that the Napoleonic Empire is an extension of the French Revolution is reaching. Especially when you consider that the Napoleonic Empire was the counter revolution. The Napoleonic Empire only appropriated the "aesthetic" of the French Revolution.
Depends on how you look at it.
But generally, they were all part of the same era and without the Napoleonic reign, modern France wouldn't exist since Napoleon established the common law in France.
You can only go surface level if you really wanted to especially in a conversation as basic as "do material or ideological conditions create terrorism?".
Sure, but such discussions don't really go anywhere since both of these are highly complex topics.
We're going back to the same exact argument we had in the beginning! We're going in a circle!
Naah, just the thesis statement of the thread. LoL
People adhere to ideologies either by birth (in which case it becomes a part of the culture) or because it correlates with their life experiences and thoughts. Basic principles are never taken literally because humans are fundamentally symbolic creatures.
Sure, but if they just happened to be born into it, then they usually don't often end up following it, atleast not to the fullest extent.
Basic principles are adhered to by an ideology's true followers, and those usually the ones who end up taking control since they're the ones with enough zeal to go the extra mile.
That is why in a discussion about Islamic terrorism, you can't take theology out of it; The ones who drive it are taking power because they're the ones willing to go the extra mile and enforce the basic principles to the letter.
This is perhaps the key point that it seems not fully communicated in this discussion; The regular man's experience is generally irrelevant since he\she is not in power, nor will they be as they don't have the sufficient ideological drive to do what it takes.
It's exhausting on my end because I have to explain my point of view and write essays on a mobile phone. My thumbs are going to break. اتركني وحبي حبيبي !
OLX.
You can get a basic laptop for 40-50$ (Used though).
It'll serve you better.
Vive la révolution