None of what you posted contradicts what I said earlier: Modi got elected democratically, by a landslide.
I add that whatever negative one can say about India, Pakistan is ten thousand times worse. As if people do not get lynched in Pakistan, especially non-Muslims ?
Pakistan is extremely hypocritical when it comes to Kashmir.
An independent Kashmir does not feature anywhere in Pakistan's allegations. They would for instance not tolerate for a second an anti-Pakistan movement in Pakistan-administered Kashmir.
Indian-administered Kashmir will never come under Pakistan rule, ever. The sooner this fact sinks in, the sooner some accommodation can be found.
Hitler , an inspiration for the BJP /RSS , was also elected by a landslide . https://m.dw.com/en/fact-or-fiction-adolf-hitler-won-an-election-in-1932/a-18680673
And I feel that your assertion that Kashmir cannot be independent , as long as Pakistan retains Azad Kashmir
, would be like claiming that the " Bear Flag Revolt " , which resulted in the California Republic
, was unsuccessful in achieving California's independence from Mexico , given that Mexico still possesses Baja California
. And your other contention , that lynchings take place in Pakistan as well , it quite literally a " whatabourism"