For Zionism, Socialism and Brotherhood amongst Nations - Mishmar paper banner, Mapam Party (Israel)
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
SSDR wrote:I am against identity denial. I would not want to live around people who are very different than me. I would not want to be surrounded by people who make noise all night and who turn communities into shit hole slums.
I would not want anyone to walk freely without worrying about being raped by someone who comes from Africa or the Middle East.
I am not a "Stalinist." I am not a "Marxist-Leninist." Lenin and Stalin were Zionists. The Soviet Union was a mixed, Zionist state who made the DDR a decoy state. They tried to make Poland their decoy as well.
I am not a "follower" of the Soviet Union.
Deutschmania wrote:Yet you have labeled yourself a Communist , in your profile here in the forum . Don't you see how people here are confused about what you are about ?
Also , you are coming across as holding to racial prejudice . As for me , I just feel that whether we have integration , or separation of the various ethnic communities , such as by perhaps designating the " black belt " an African-American ethno-state https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/black-belt-republic-1928-1934/ , all peoples should by right have equitable standing with one another .
Also , I myself value community , and upholding community standards . However , I do not feel , based upon my personal experience , that blacks are any more uncouth than their white counterparts.
And I believe that most Americans , and quite possibly Europeans as well , share a common popular culture.
SSDR wrote:There is different variations of socialism. Not every socialist has to be a denier who believes in false Zionist propaganda like "racial denial."
Deutschmania is a western neo Marxist of whom is trying to deny ethnic and racial differences between humans.
Rancid wrote:I want to become a socialist. I really do. It's just, I love money.
SolarCross wrote:The irony of Deutschmania's complaint against you is that his hero Marx (PBUH) was a far more obnoxious racist than you are.
Marx was pretty rude about jews too, ironically.
Why do you continue to make me laugh with your outrageous and semi-truthful statements eh?
You are too cynical about human nature to become a socialist. You think? I am not sharing my dough with people who don't respect how hard it is to defend my American Dream from the hands of the racists, and the blanquitos, and the negritos, and the chinitos....I just don't trust people. That is my issue.
Where is the plane next to the airport in Austin? I have to take the money and run...change my name, dye my hair. It is all best that no one hold me accountable.
I am a socialist for a simple reason Rancid. I think society comes first when planning for human needs. Not capital. Society first. Everything else stems from serving society. You serve your family, your neighbors and the state should be in the business of making a secure life for everyone according to their needs and their abilities. Not to oppress, not to empoverish, not to deny rights. But to do the opposite.
Te quiero mucho muchacho.
Pants-of-dog wrote:What is the type of oppression that Marxism is supposed to address?
Pants-of-dog wrote:No. That is incorrect.
The answer is exploitation that is leveraged through economic control of the working class.
What is the relationship between the class system
Pants-of-dog wrote:What is the difference between socialism and communism?
SSDR wrote:You do not know yet you call yourself a "Socialist?" !
Socialism is an economic system. "Communism" is a political system that USES socialism to get to "Communism."
Pants-of-dog wrote:Close, but that is also incorrect.
Communism argues that the state is unnecessary and the path to stateless and classless societies does not require the state.
Deutschmania wrote:In fact he was a known opponent of racism.
SSDR wrote:You are incorrect. Again.
A CAPITALIST state that DEFENDS currency is not required in a socialist state. "Stateless" is no capitalist state. When people say "stateless," they don't mean anarchist chaos like what you're spouting.
What is "socilaism?" No English word like that exists.
Not only you do not know what socialism is, but you cannot spell the term "socialism."
I always have good sources, I just assume that […]
Farmers protest violence condemned, but four prov[…]
Here's Mark Blyth on the macro'n'cheese podcast, […]
This could be a platform for our conquest of Green[…]