- 09 Dec 2019 13:55
#15053246
1) You fight or you don't. It's that simple. And you don't want to fight over the Russian attack. So why ignore Russian meddling, and go after the much less important attack by China????
2) Go proverb: "Rich men don't pick fights"
3) Umm, no. It used to be MAD, mutual assured destruction. Putin is try to build a new generation of tactical nukes, and use them to intimidate Europe from acting to defend against the Russian conquests he is clearly planning.
4) Quite the opposite of that..
blackjack21 wrote:
1) China has already butt in by trying to influence agriculture-dominant states to vote against Trump.
2) So how does that make Putin more scary than Xi?
3) Tactical nuclear weapons are kind of a dumb idea. Nuclear weapons were always intended principally to destroy the means of war production--bombing industrial sectors. Nuclear weapons were developed, because bombers had a 25% attrition rate and yet rarely hit their targets. Precision bombing has made nuclear weapons practically obsolete--except as a weapon of terror.
4) So are you agreeing with me that Putin isn't that scary compared to Xi?
1) You fight or you don't. It's that simple. And you don't want to fight over the Russian attack. So why ignore Russian meddling, and go after the much less important attack by China????
2) Go proverb: "Rich men don't pick fights"
3) Umm, no. It used to be MAD, mutual assured destruction. Putin is try to build a new generation of tactical nukes, and use them to intimidate Europe from acting to defend against the Russian conquests he is clearly planning.
4) Quite the opposite of that..
Facts have a well known liberal bias