- 14 Jan 2020 10:24
#15059319
I'm saying you can't blame 1979 on 1953.
The US revolution occurred in part because the King did abuse power, but more importantly Parliament did too--imposing taxes on colonists who did not have any franchise to vote in Parliamentary elections, but could vote in their local assemblies. Consequently, independence became a rather obvious answer.
Iran is a very different story. I suppose you could look at a lot of Iran's anti-Semitism as arising from the Reuter concession and Nassir al-Din Shah obviously precarious hold on power, who pretty much sold Iran to Paul Julius Freiherr von Reuter (born Israel Beer Josaphat). It was cancelled almost immediately. He later sold a tobacco concession, which was also cancelled due to public protest and is credited with sparking Iranian nationalism. Ironically, Mossadeq married one of his many granddaughters.
Anyway, the US brokered a 50/50 deal for Iranian oil, and Iran even nationalized that in 1979. The net effect? In 2017, Iran briefly achieved oil output equal to what it had been in 1979.
Again, let's be very clear. Iran was much better off under Mohammed Reza Pahlavi Shah.
So why do you think he's bothering with an election in 2020? And why do you think he's even marginally close to becoming a dictator? He only gets done what popular will dictates and Nancy Pelosi can't object to. He will definitely be gone by January 2025. It's all but guaranteed. He's too old to even want to rule beyond that time.
late wrote:Governments change, or are you saying we should call the Queen, say we're sorry, and that it will never happen again?
I'm saying you can't blame 1979 on 1953.
The US revolution occurred in part because the King did abuse power, but more importantly Parliament did too--imposing taxes on colonists who did not have any franchise to vote in Parliamentary elections, but could vote in their local assemblies. Consequently, independence became a rather obvious answer.
Iran is a very different story. I suppose you could look at a lot of Iran's anti-Semitism as arising from the Reuter concession and Nassir al-Din Shah obviously precarious hold on power, who pretty much sold Iran to Paul Julius Freiherr von Reuter (born Israel Beer Josaphat). It was cancelled almost immediately. He later sold a tobacco concession, which was also cancelled due to public protest and is credited with sparking Iranian nationalism. Ironically, Mossadeq married one of his many granddaughters.
Anyway, the US brokered a 50/50 deal for Iranian oil, and Iran even nationalized that in 1979. The net effect? In 2017, Iran briefly achieved oil output equal to what it had been in 1979.
Again, let's be very clear. Iran was much better off under Mohammed Reza Pahlavi Shah.
late wrote:Trump is trying to become a dictator, and he's getting closer all the time.
So why do you think he's bothering with an election in 2020? And why do you think he's even marginally close to becoming a dictator? He only gets done what popular will dictates and Nancy Pelosi can't object to. He will definitely be gone by January 2025. It's all but guaranteed. He's too old to even want to rule beyond that time.
"We have put together the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics."
-- Joe Biden
-- Joe Biden