Should Black Supremacists Get Punched In The Face For Wanting An Ethnostate? - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

All general discussion about politics that doesn't belong in any of the other forums.

Moderator: PoFo Political Circus Mods

#15105522
Face-punching is very low brow for this forum. But I will nonetheless humor your thread with a well crafted reply.

If Black Americans want an ethnostate, it's because it is probably the only way to develop an economy that will work for this community.

200 years of slavery, Jim Crow, segregation, token Uncle Toms, and a low social status are the equivalent of social failure - of the United States. The racism that built the "country" might just destroy it.
#15105589
Godstud wrote:No, but people should punch racists like you, in the face.


What happened to you Godstud? You used to hate militias :p

Godstud wrote:

#14638129

Their issue may indeed be unconstitutional, but the reaction of the militia is what I see as the real problem. They should not be involved, and their "threat" is what should be considered.


Saeko wrote:They are doing absolutely NOTHING illegal here. What's the problem, maz?


Are you sure about that?

Menacing Law and Legal Definition

Menacing is a crime governed by state laws, which vary by state, but typically involves displaying a weapon or a course of conduct that intentionally places another person in reasonable fear of physical injury or death.
#15105596
Saeko wrote:They are doing absolutely NOTHING illegal here. What's the problem, maz?

Black militia, armed, openly walking through the streets exercising their 2nd amendment... Sounds like these racist's worse nightmare. :lol: :lol:
Maybe we just need more of this, perhaps some endorsement from very big, very black, very "scary" black men of the NRA to have some common-sense gun control.

On the other hand, making a Wakanda in the middle of texas doesn't sound like a bad idea :lol: .
Maybe we should split, Black America, Latino America, White America, and Trump America. I call dibs on the midwestern area with Illinois/Michigan, I think controlling the potable water of the great lakes will be a good idea. Although perhaps securing some coastal territory might be a great idea as well :lol:
#15105636
maz wrote:Are you sure about that?

Saeko wrote:Yeah, I'm sure about that, because nobody cited these laws when the Neo-Nazis and MAGAs did the exact same thing, Karen. :roll:

Indeed - you can ask the officials:
Stone Mountain State Park officials said the Black militia group was peaceful, orderly and escorted by police as they called for the removal of the country's largest Confederate monument near Atlanta.

https://www.newsweek.com/armed-black-de ... rk-1515494

Maybe maz is just triggered by lots of black people.
#15105648
People shouldn't be punching Nazis or black supremacists in the face, unless they have legal reason to do so (in self-defense by repelling an attacker). Your personal dislike of someone's opinions is not grounds for assault, ever.

However, I would think it ok to shit on their lawn, because I;d find that hilarious. :excited:
#15105650
QatzelOk wrote:If Black Americans want an ethnostate, it's because it is probably the only way to develop an economy that will work for this community.

200 years of slavery, Jim Crow, segregation, token Uncle Toms, and a low social status are the equivalent of social failure - of the United States. The racism that built the "country" might just destroy it.

It's possible. However, all other black-majority countries haven't done that well (even in the America's, ie: Jamaica, Trinidad etc) so there's more than racism probably going on here at the current time. Things like education, culture etc.
#15105651
Unthinking Majority wrote:However, all other black-majority countries haven't done that well (even in the America's, ie: Jamaica, Trinidad etc) so there's more than racism probably going on here at the current time. Things like education, culture etc.


Don't discourage them. Blacks wanting to separate from whites and vice versa should be supported.
#15105654
Code Rood wrote:Don't discourage them. Blacks wanting to separate from whites and vice versa should be supported.

Well, the US already set up a black ethnostate for African-Americans, called Liberia. It didn't have the intended effect, at least not for the Quakers. For the racists, I suppose it did.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberia#Early_colonization


In the United States there was a movement to settle free-born blacks and freed slaves in Africa. This was ostensibly because they faced racial discrimination in the form of political disenfranchisement and the denial of civil, religious, and social rights.[16] Formed in 1816, the American Colonization Society was made up mostly of Quakers and slaveholders. Quakers believed blacks would face better chances for freedom in Africa than in the U.S.[6][17] While slaveholders opposed freedom for blacks, they viewed repatriation as a way to avoid rebellions.[6]

In 1822 the American Colonization Society began sending black volunteers to the Pepper Coast, the closest point of Africa and therefore the least expensive to reach, to establish a colony for freed blacks. Although mortality from tropical diseases was horrendous — of the 4,571 emigrants who arrived in Liberia between 1820 and 1843, only 1,819 were alive in 1843 — by 1867 the ACS (and state-related chapters) had assisted in the migration of more than 13,000 blacks to Liberia.[20] These free African-Americans and their descendants married within their community and came to identify as Americo-Liberians. Many were of mixed race and educated in American culture; they did not identify with the indigenous natives of the tribes they encountered. They intermarried largely within the colonial community, developing an ethnic group that had a cultural tradition infused with American notions of political republicanism and Protestant Christianity.

The ACS, supported by prominent American politicians such as Abraham Lincoln, Henry Clay, and James Monroe, believed "repatriation" of free African Americans — sending them to Africa — was preferable to having emancipated slaves remain in the United States
#15105655
Saeko wrote:They are doing absolutely NOTHING illegal here. What's the problem, maz?

Actually what they're doing is pretty darn American. Demanding their freedom and rights at gunpoint. Not any different than the American Revolution and Declaration of Independence.
#15105683
maz wrote:


That's a large amount of armed black people in this video. The leader says they're all ex-military. If there's that many marching there's obviously at least some minimal amount of organization. It's not just a random crowd of protestors. They're all armed and have a purpose.

It's a wonder the Black Panther hasn't made a big resurgence recently. Maybe they have, I dunno.
Blast in Beirut, Lebanon

I saw a piece of footage which made me wonder how […]

Thank you Crantag for replying. Not in order. As I[…]

Trump digs his political grave

Worse people? Sure. Worse people that are this in[…]

We are getting rid of the name Redskins now anyway[…]