The war on sensemaking.
B0ycey wrote:All three options are positive. What if you have an negative opinion of Palantir?
@RhetoricThug this is a thread for you.
I appreciate invocation, although I'm not meant to appear as a subversive demigod
and argue dimensional privacy. I'm far too busy replying elsewhere, but I understand the urgency in this case- militant and economic regency. Data analytics, public analysis, and aggregation of mental actions brands the end of anonymity as Palantir. End of what, you ask? The end of unmutual socialization, as defined by those in power, as defined by the legislative process. Credit systems are bound to facilitate a platform for mutual solicitation, er, oscillation. See, I observe the physics within social movements. Monkey minds
are perpetually contributing to their enslavement. After-all, privacy is a barrier to scientific progress.
Many theorists and realists condense aphorisms and exegesis that expose this kind of technocratic philosophy. It's not far off to suggest that our technologies would eventually overtake (let alone augment) organic behavior, but we're entering an era where human behavior is expected to be curtailed by the technology a given human employs to accomplish its mostly economic activities. I've treated guests and forum members to many of my thoughts; Sadly, I share this field with you. We enslave ourselves...
If I had full "control"
over my advisories, I'd convince them pedagogically that my geopolitical position is essential and necessary. There isn't a more concerned referee here, I'm fully engaged in warning our guests of the dangers of Palantir. Data software outlines and confines personal attributes, that ultimately construct streams of pseudo-critical datum, of which unqualified whores of industry (with all types of genetic issues) process for bureaucratic reformation and interpretation. I wish I could tell you who or what's driving this self-destructive and anti-human innovation.
We're convinced that technological referendums are more responsible than the features which spawn contrivances. We don't understand how to control popular thought. We'd rather filter and amalgamate thought. All of our extensions place restrictions or modifications on self-governance and replace humanoid autonomy. What kind of premonition do I invoke? Contemporary or corporate culture gives way to unthinkable technological milieus.
Does Palantir See Too Much: Yes, because you want it to. -RT