- 03 Oct 2020 18:19
#15124713
You are literally addressing an off topic criticism by pointing out how I did not address another off topic criticism in another thread. This is one of the classic ways you avoid debate: by bringing up how I debate.
Every single piece you post is from biased sources known for posting incorrect and misleading information. It is almost all editorials.
Yes, you justify it by accusing the “MSM” of doing the same. You openly embrace the same journalistic practices you condemn in those you call the MSM.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...
Doug64 wrote:That’s a rather interesting comment, considering my thorough critique of the ruling on the Washington Times in the “Undocumented Aliens and Crime” thread. The critique that you ignored entirely?
You are literally addressing an off topic criticism by pointing out how I did not address another off topic criticism in another thread. This is one of the classic ways you avoid debate: by bringing up how I debate.
And while I post informed opinions of those in a better position to know whereof they speak than I do, I mostly post hard news stories that aren’t likely to get much coverage from the MSM(D). Informed debate and discussion requires facts, after all, and that’s what the Leftists in the MSM(D) want to deny you—or are simply so blinded by their own biases that they don’t consider them news worth bothering with. Like the story about a joint BLM/Proud Boys news conference condemning White supremacy, it doesn’t fit their narrative you see, any more than the fact that the Proud Boys’ international chairman is a Black Hispanic.
Every single piece you post is from biased sources known for posting incorrect and misleading information. It is almost all editorials.
Yes, you justify it by accusing the “MSM” of doing the same. You openly embrace the same journalistic practices you condemn in those you call the MSM.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...