Doug64 wrote:And they are proper numbers—the CDC’s best estimate of our ten-year rolling average of flu deaths to how many are reported lost to the Wuhan virus.
And once again, if you are comparing
estimated flu deaths to
confirmed deaths from Covid, then you are being misleading. In many cases, the
estimated number of flu deaths is easily twice as many, which would greatly influence the ration you keep presenting as “data”.
Again, what “methodology”? I’m just providing the reported death tolls.
When you give a ratio of flu deaths to Covid deaths, you are using the data to create an impression of the severity of the Covid virus, are you not?
And if you use the incorrect data (by using
estimated deaths instead of
confirmed deaths) you can make the Covid virus seem less severe than it is.
If you believe that reports of the total and weekly deaths per million are pointless and misleading, take it up with those government organizations providing the “pointless and misleading” numbers.
This is not what I claimed.
Again, these simple numbers can be perfectly accurate and yet would still not give an accurate impression of which ideological group is actually more likely to get Covid, all other things being equal.
This is because you have not accounted for a host of other factors that would also affect infection rates, and instead have only looked at the way the state tends to vote.
So I looked at an actual study that also looks at the relationship between ideological beliefs and infection rates, but also accounts for other factors; something you, again, have not done.
And the actual science shows that Trump supporters get it more often, all other things being equal.
Please provide links to these studies.
I already have, including a quote of the relevant text.
Would you like me to post it again?
Hey, it was Pants-of-dog that brought it up this time, point your spam at him.
No, you literally bring it up every single time you post your misleading graph.