think what sparks confusion among many people is the trend of ideological bipolar generalization between nationalism and globalism, what I think is just agitprop mirage because infact there are different types of globalism eg. Neocon Globalism vs International Globalism etc. so sorry if my topic title here is also out of sync, but essentially I am referring to the enlightenment ideals of Brotherhood and Equality thus logically the socialistic nwo globalization!
hm, must acknowledge all this even as terminology is too messy for essaying eg. the true origin of the word globalism
comes as post-ww2 western dominionist strive for compactness of the western realm [1
] thus we could say there is semantic misunderstanding and misuse of this term, which nowadays is mostly used for marking of any nwo agenda of the international socialists, that as such was in motion since the enlightenment era onward, yet in the beginning in its first phase strive for overthrowing royalism through republicanism
> that in its far-left corner became socialism
and as centralized federal evolved in communism
, while in its esoterical (freemasonic) far-right became nationalism
and as centralized eg. is evolving in unionism tho still not matured in full blown western-united-nations for what first eu need to become federal so it could merge later with usA and Canada!
have in mind the freemasonic goals mids enlightenment national movement and how/why has spread in royal europe and america [1
] first in uK [2
] then UsA [2
] and after France [2
] as such indeed points to greater nwo scheme, which somehow it could be rooted through the baconian "new atlantis" so it wouldnt be at all wrong to mark such nwo as atlantism
, now were atlantic experiments also the bolshevik-communism and nazi-socialism, hm that is really tempting to speculate i.e. all clues in this case also leads to freemasonry, all in all this kind of globalism needs to have specific mark eg. as proposed atlantism!?