I know there is probably a difference, but am not sure what that exactly is. Maybe someone more intelligent on the topic could help me out.
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Todd D. wrote:In addition, check out this site and read question number 4.
nice and easy theoretical read, but what they need to know is that they cant in by revolution, thats just wasted time for any steady change, especially in the current geopolitical and geoeconomical circumstances,
however they can maximize their goals if they think as left-centrist i.e. green party alike, attracting Youth need more than ideology i.e. it needs motto and think enviromentalism could be proper magnet, although as the same is now misused by the left it can be tricky to be overtake from them such good propaganda tool , yet if we know that their co2 hype could be easily demystified by methane-math there is chance this could be potentially achieved , even more after the next democratic fiasco after the next economic crisis ...
... but this to be done there should be in place massive media agitprop, and for that from help could be movie and music industry ... now there would be also need of financiers for all that, but if those popular events are managed in commercial way think many companies would seek to take the opportunity ... yet all that to be reinsured from sabotage risks, libertarian party should offer Open Society approach and act through own e-forums, just imagine the might of PoFo used in shaping on e-political practical programme in front of everyone and by anyone i.e. one open e-forum for party members and one parallel for guests, like that things will move fast and any potential intrusion will be noticed in time ...
good typo, neither they can get IN nor WIN through revolution, although their founding fathers dive deep in such reasoning, at least they can dream about it!
“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants” 
@Red_Army hm You are talking about economic libertarianism, then try Libertarian Socialism  something way more acceptable for me in any future economic collapse or global cataclysm i.e. till there is strong liberal capitalism any eventual lib.soc. is doomed by certain risks of corruption, unless there is introduced tribalism on the horizon, and for what I am mostly fond of decentralization which is truly possible in libertarian circumstances, yet it must be with centrist orientation so it could last longer i.e. to be applied the rational paradigm "People should be free to do what they want if it doesn’t hurt others" 
Moral relativism does not seem to say that nothing[…]
With 'allies' like these who needs enemies? Chin[…]
March 6, Friday A skirmish on the White River,[…]
You did not bring any evidence whatsoever, nor di[…]