Pants-of-dog wrote:At the same time, trans people on the other side of this debate can rightfully accuse me of transphobia if I unilaterally support trans exclusionary feminists.
And there are trans people who are radical feminists who agree with me too. Not all transwomen and transmen are liberal feminists.
Stop calling us trans exclusionary feminists, we're just feminists who have only ever centered women (and children) in our politics. It's about as absurd as calling us male exclusionary feminists.
And no matter who I support, I would rightfully be accused of using my privilege to butt into a conversation that should also be only for (cis and trans) women.
Yet you've been the only one debating me while defending trans rights only and entirely ignoring women's rights. Still. After I posted all of the above (which there is plenty more of). You know you can defend trans rights (that are not being violated as far as I'm aware) while also opposing the violation of women's rights and spaces. You do know that, don't you?
Again, stop calling women cis. Those in my camp reject that label. It's hilarious that your camp goes on about demanding whatever pronouns and then labels people whatever you like without asking if it applies. Stop doing that.
He debate itself seems like a women’s only space. The debate about spaces is not one I think I should participate in.
Agreed, yet you have done ITT and before with me on this topic and defending the TRA position, ignoring entirely women's grievances about it.
If you want to discuss sexual assault, then I am willing to discuss that again. That is definitely within my mandate.
That is just one aspect of transwomen violating women and their rights. I've posted plenty more that you continue to ignore.
If you wish to believe I claimed that, feel free. I am not interested in clarifying strawmen.
You are continuing your theme of ignoring women's grievances at trans ideology, grievances that came about after stuff like what I mentioned in the last post that you pretty much dismissed once more.