Pants-of-dog wrote:Yes, it is clear that you think you have understood. That does not change what I have said. The example you gave had nothing to do with preventing someone from filming the cop, which was the topic of conversation.
Indeed, it did not, yet it doesn't matter. The complaint filed in your scenario would be that the cell phone was illegally taken. I don't see why would cops not investigate it through.
Pants-of-dog wrote:It is indicative of how police view black drug addicts. And how they want the public to see black drug addicts.
It is indicative of how the defense is trying to get Derek Chauvin out.