Gardener wrote:In a cocked hat it has ! I repeat: the abstracts do NOT support your assertion, and it would cost me £35 to access the full study.
You asked for evidence. I provided it.
The fact that you do not accept the evidence is predictable, so I will, instead, ask what you would accept as evidence.
Utter piffle. That is NOT my analysis, and I'd prefer you to STOP putting words into my mouth. My approach is to seek evidence when people make assertions.
It is a simple fact:
Either systemic racism is a significant factor in modern US society or it is not.
You are asking for evidence that it is. This implies that you are holding the position that systemic racism is not relevant. If you are not holding that position, then please clarify.
Once more, you ask me to prove a negative. I would suggest that it is down to the proponents of CRH to justify THEIR assertions that inequities are caused by racism, and that "systemic racism" actually exists.
I am tempted to start a thread to explain to everyone that proving a negative is very possible. I can, for example, prove that no living elephants are in my nose.
I will, instead, note that you have not provided an argument.
Right now, CRT and similar arguments are being censored by US government forces. I think it should be the censors explaining why they must censor it. So far, no one has been able to explain this to me.