ccdan wrote:TOTALLY FALSE!
Not a single one of those is an approval of military action against a state!
Just "condemnations" and other irrelevant stuff.
Nobody had the interest to attack NATO.
But things may change, as NATO, post Cold War, turned into a murderous criminal organization hell bent on waging all kinds of illegal wars - mainly at the request/desire of the US. Many nations are fed up with NATO. Even NATO itself isn't feeling very well. Lots of Europeans are fed up with what Americans are doing around Europe. They will be asked to go home sooner or later. The supposed rivalry between Europe and Russia is largely a fictive state of affairs invented and promoted by the Americans - and many Europeans know that!
Yes, nobody has an interest of attacking the best armed and equipped military alliance in the world and that is the whole point because it is suicide.
As for your propaganda and claims of it being false, you clearly have no real understanding how NATO actually works.
1) Yugoslavia has many resolution that permitted both the military actions and the peacekeepers.
2) Afghanistan has the peace keeping resolution that NATO uses.
3) Libya obviously had the no fly zone resolution that was used to permit the air strikes and grounding of Qadaffis airforce.
Reality is that, there is no way anybody can realistically even attempt to fight NATO and its important allies. So calling it sick, is just outright stupidity. It has fulfilled its duty with 100% efficiency considering that no NATO members has ever had a war on its territory.